← 論文一覧に戻る

カーボンニュートラルとエネルギー転換を背景としたグリーンファイナンス、技術革新、住民の生態学的福祉の持続可能な循環経路

Sustainable Circular Path of Green Finance, Technological Innovation and Resident Ecological Welfare: Against the Background of Carbon Neutrality and Energy Transition (原題)

Ximiao Dong, Lihui Xiong

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-05#green_financeOrigin: CN
DOI: 10.3390/su18179132
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18179132

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、中国279都市のデータを用いて、グリーンファイナンスが生態学的福祉パフォーマンス（EWP）に与える影響を実証分析。グリーンファイナンス指数（GFI）の0.1単位の上昇がEWPを平均0.0605単位向上させ、グリーン技術革新が部分的な媒介効果を持つことを明らかにした。地域差も確認され、中央部では効果が有意でない。

English

Using data from 279 Chinese cities, this study empirically analyzes the impact of green finance on ecological welfare performance (EWP). A 0.1-unit increase in the green finance index (GFI) raises EWP by an average of 0.0605 units, with green technological innovation acting as a partial mediator. Regional disparities exist, with insignificant effects in Central China.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、グリーンファイナンスの効果を地域レベルで検証した研究は少なく、SSBJ開示や地域金融機関の投融資判断に示唆を与える。特に、技術革新を媒介する経路は、日本の地域イノベーション政策との関連で参考になる。

In the global GX context

This study contributes to the global literature on green finance effectiveness, offering empirical evidence from China that can inform policy design in other countries. The mediation pathway through technological innovation highlights the importance of integrating innovation policies with green finance initiatives.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the green finance-ecological welfare nexus, useful for further research in environmental finance.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of green finance in driving ecological outcomes, relevant for corporate sustainability strategy.

🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for designing green finance policies that promote technological innovation and ecological welfare.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Many current studies have purely regarded green finance as green credit, ignoring the background of carbon neutrality and energy transition. This paper investigates the relationships among green finance, green technological innovation, and urban ecological welfare performance. Using 279 Chinese cities as examples, this paper reveals the following: there is (1) a direct positive effect, where a 0.1-unit absolute increase in the green finance index (GFI) is associated with an average 0.0605-unit rise in ecological welfare performance (EWP); (2) a partial mediation mechanism through green technological innovation, establishing a “finance → technology → ecology” pathway; (3) temporal persistence of positive effects across pre-2012 and post-2012 policy periods; and (4) regional disparities with significant impacts in Eastern/Western/Northeastern China but insignificant effects in Central China due to lower green credit allocation and weaker R&D intensity. Robustness checks, including Winsorization and subgroup analyses, validate these results. This study advances the integration of environmental finance with sustainable development theory, offering actionable insights for achieving ecological welfare goals.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。