持続可能なエネルギー移行の交渉：社会イノベーション、権力動態、クリーン調理慣行
Negotiating Sustainable Energy Transition: Social Innovation, Power Dynamics, and Clean-Cooking Practices (原題)
Jeremiah Thoronka
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はルワンダ・キガリのクリーン調理移行を民族誌的に分析し、都市のエネルギー移行が単なる燃料転換ではなく、ジェンダー化された労働や世帯内権力、インフラ制約、信頼関係によって再編される調理慣行の交渉過程であると論じる。アクセスは必ずしも定着を意味せず、世帯は段階的・混成的な調理形態をとり、社会的イノベーションは許可・慣行・能力・信頼の再構成を通じて生じる。持続可能で公正な移行には所有台数ではなく、日常的利用・意思決定権・負担可能性・安全性の評価が必要だと結論づける。
English
This ethnographic study of clean-cooking transitions in Kigali, Rwanda, argues that urban energy transition is a negotiated reorganisation of cooking practices shaped by gendered labour, household authority, infrastructure, and trust, not a linear fuel switch. Access does not equal appropriation; households use hybrid, sequenced arrangements, and social innovation emerges through reconfigured permissions, routines, and trust. Just transitions require assessing sustained use, decision-making control, affordability, and safety rather than ownership counts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では直接の開示・政策接続は薄いが、家庭部門の脱炭素やエネルギー貧困、需要側の行動変容を扱う国内研究・政策設計にとって、権力とジェンダーの視点を提供する示唆がある。
In the global GX context
For global GX scholarship, this paper broadens transition finance and just-transition debates by showing that household-level power, gender, and trust—not just technology access—determine whether clean-energy investments translate into sustained use, a dimension often missing from TCFD/ISSB-style disclosure metrics.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー移行研究に社会実践理論と権力論を統合する分析枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:家庭向けクリーンエネルギー製品・サービスの普及施策では、所有ではなく継続利用と意思決定権に着目すべきと示唆する。
🏛政策担当者:調理用燃料補助や普及政策の評価指標を、導入台数から日常的利用・安全性・負担可能性へ広げる必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy transition scholarship often privileges technology, infrastructure, and policy targets while giving insufficient attention to how power is negotiated in everyday household practice. This article addresses that gap through an ethnographic analysis of clean-cooking transitions in Kigali, Rwanda. It argues that urban energy transition is not simply a shift from biomass and charcoal to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or electricity, but a negotiated reorganisation of cooking practices shaped by gendered labour, household authority, infrastructural constraints, moral economies of taste, and trust in markets and institutions. Bringing together social practice theory, energy justice, political ecology, and a relational understanding of power as power to, power with, and power over, the article analyses household cooking routines, adoption and non-adoption narratives, and the institutional conditions that structure everyday energy use. The findings show that access does not equal appropriation; households rely on sequenced and hybrid cooking arrangements rather than linear fuel switching; gatekeeping artefacts and trust infrastructures shape who may use modern energy, when, and under what conditions; and social innovation emerges through reconfigured permissions, routines, competences, and relations of trust. The article concludes that durable and just clean-cooking transitions require interventions that move beyond ownership counts to assess sustained everyday use, decision-making control, affordability, safety, and the practical ability of primary cooks to make cleaner energy part of routine meal preparation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.62470/1e261309first seen 2026-09-22 04:35:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。