コミュニティの炭素便益と村収入の橋渡し：インドネシア西ジャワにおけるアグロフォレストリー型炭素クレジットの制度ガバナンス
Bridging Community Carbon Benefits and Village Revenue: Institutional Governance of Agroforestry-Based Carbon Credits in West Java, Indonesia (原題)
Sumarlan Sumarlan, Meilinda Suriani Harefa, Amal H. Aljaddani
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドネシア西ジャワ州の5県を対象に、アグロフォレストリー型炭素クレジット開発における村の準備状況、制度ガバナンス、コミュニティのエンパワーメントを定性的に分析した。その結果、土地の利用可能性やコミュニティの能力はあるものの、炭素クレジットの経済的便益が村の公式収入（PADes）に自動的には結びつかず、農家グループや協同組合に留まっていることが明らかになった。この制度的ギャップが、コミュニティの便益と村収入の連携を阻害している。
English
This qualitative study examines village readiness, institutional governance, and community empowerment in agroforestry-based carbon credit development across five regencies in West Java, Indonesia. Findings show that while land availability and community capacity exist, economic benefits from carbon credits do not automatically translate into formal village revenue (PADes), remaining with farmer groups and cooperatives. The institutional gap constrains the link between community carbon benefits and village revenue systems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、J-クレジット制度や地域循環共生圏の文脈で、地域コミュニティが炭素クレジットから便益を得る仕組みづくりが課題となっている。本研究成果は、日本の自治体や地域コミュニティが炭素クレジットを地域経済に結びつける際の制度的課題を示唆する。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to the global discourse on carbon credit governance and rural development, particularly in the context of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and voluntary carbon markets. It highlights the importance of institutional arrangements in ensuring that carbon benefits reach local communities and formal revenue systems, relevant for countries implementing community-based carbon projects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素クレジットの制度的ガバナンスと地域経済への影響に関する定性的知見を提供。
🏢実務担当者:地域コミュニティや自治体が炭素クレジットを村収入に結びつける際の制度的課題を理解するための示唆。
🏛政策担当者:炭素クレジットの地域便益を最大化するための制度設計の重要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Agroforestry-based carbon credit development offers opportunities to combine climate change mitigation with rural economic development. However, existing studies have mainly examined carbon trading regulations, carbon sequestration valuation, and agroforestry productivity, leaving limited understanding of how carbon credit initiatives are implemented institutionally at the village level and connected to Village Original Income (PADes). This study examines village readiness, institutional governance, and community empowerment in agroforestry-based carbon credit development, particularly their role in connecting community economic benefits with village revenue systems. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed in five regencies in West Java Province. Data were collected through field observations, interviews with village governments, farmer groups, cooperatives, facilitators, and community members, discussions, and documentary studies. Outreach and technical training were treated as community capacity-building activities. Data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, interpretation, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that village readiness is supported by land availability, community literacy, technical capacity, and local institutions. However, community-level economic benefits from agroforestry-based carbon credit activities do not automatically translate into formal village revenue. Most benefits remain managed by farmer groups and cooperatives, while Village-Owned Enterprises (Bumdesa) and village regulatory mechanisms remain limited. This institutional gap constrains the connection between community carbon benefits and PADes. The study contributes to carbon and rural institutional governance literature by demonstrating that the potential economic benefits of village-based carbon credits depend not only on land and community capacity but also on institutional arrangements that connect community benefits with formal village revenue systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v18i2.74897first seen 2026-08-24 04:54:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。