Market Mechanisms, Corporations and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
市場メカニズム、企業とパリ協定第6条 (AI 翻訳)
Ling Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、パリ協定第6条における企業の役割に着目し、市場メカニズムへの企業参加が国際法に与える影響を分析する。企業と国家の区別が国際法上の制約となる一方、第6条は市場メカニズムを規律する枠組みとして最適であると論じる。特に、公私混在型ガバナンスにおける企業行動の調整可能性を探る。
English
This paper examines corporate participation in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, arguing that while international law's distinction between state and non-state actors limits corporate use, Article 6 remains the best framework to regulate market mechanisms. It explores how interpretation and adaptation can accommodate increasingly influential corporate action in hybrid governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は二国間クレジット制度（JCM）を通じて第6条の実装を積極的に進めており、本分析は日本の企業や政策担当者が国際炭素市場の法的枠組みを理解する上で有用。第6条の柔軟な解釈は、JCMの今後の発展にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Article 6 is central to international carbon markets and NDC implementation. This legal analysis clarifies how corporations can engage, offering insights for global carbon trading rules, especially relevant as countries finalize Article 6 rulebook and private sector participation grows.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a legal framework for analyzing corporate roles in Article 6 and the evolution of international climate law.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams understand legal opportunities and constraints in participating in Article 6 carbon markets.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to design Article 6 rules that effectively integrate corporate actors while ensuring environmental integrity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The scholarly and policy responses to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement have centered around the controversy over its negotiations, the rapid legal developments it has caused, and the different pathways for its implementation. Less is known about how corporations will use Article 6 for transnational cooperation, their role in generating new forms of climate governance or climate law, and the multi-level governance challenge that arises from the interaction between corporations and the state-centric regime. This chapter aims to enrich these discussions by explaining the legal processes and practices for involving corporate actors and partnerships in market mechanisms. I argue that corporate participation in market mechanisms tests international law's ability to react and improve. Although climate change does not distinguish state and non-state actors, international law does. This distinction limits corporate use of Article 6 to deal with proliferated market-based systems, regulations, and standards worldwide. Even with this limitation, Article 6 is still best placed to provide an international legal framework to safeguard market mechanisms. The ability to interpret and stretch the application of Article 6 decides whether and how it can accommodate and regulate corporate action that is increasingly influential in the public-private or hybrid governance of market mechanisms.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5161759first seen 2026-07-24 05:11:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。