The Political Network Governance of Indonesia's Low-Carbon Transition: A CIMO-Based Review
インドネシア低炭素移行の政治ネットワーク・ガバナンス：CIMOに基づくレビュー (AI 翻訳)
Fajar Alamsyah, Romy Hermawan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシアの低炭素政策実施には、国家と企業の癒着による障壁がある。CIMOフレームワークを用いた系統的レビューにより、断片化した国家機構と化石燃料利益団体の支配が明らかになった。石炭依存のロックインと不公正が深刻で、2060年ネットゼロ達成には透明なガバナンス改革が必要。
English
This study analyzes political network barriers to Indonesia's low-carbon transition using a CIMO-framework systematic review. It finds fragmented state apparatus, dominant fossil fuel interests, and regulatory capture, leading to carbon lock-in and severe distributive injustice. Transparent governance is recommended to accelerate the 2060 net-zero target.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドネシアは日本の重要な投資先であり、同国のエネルギー移行の成否は日本のGX戦略にも影響する。本論文は、途上国における脱炭素政策の実装障壁を政治経済学的に解明しており、日本の対アジア協力やJCM案件形成にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a detailed empirical case of carbon lock-in and regulatory capture in a major emerging economy, offering lessons for global GX policy design. It highlights how state-business nexuses can undermine climate commitments, relevant for countries grappling with fossil fuel phase-out under the Paris Agreement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for scholars studying political economy of energy transition, especially state-business relations and path dependency.
🏢実務担当者:Provides insights for corporate sustainability teams operating in Indonesia on the risks of political entanglement and the need for transparent governance.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on how informal networks and patronage can derail climate policy, suggesting reforms in regulatory transparency and stakeholder inclusivity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Despite international climate commitments, Indonesia's low-carbon policy implementation faces barriers stemming from state-business nexuses. This study analyzes actor networks impeding green economy governance. Employing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) integrated with the CIMO (Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome) framework, 16 studies were synthesized using NVivo. Results reveal a fragmented state apparatus contrasting with dominant fossil fuel interests entrenched in patronage networks. Quantitative data indicates significant power asymmetries, with 36.8 million hectares allocated to corporations versus 3.1 million hectares to communities. Regulatory capture is evident, exemplified by the 0% royalty clause in the Omnibus Law. Consequently, implementation gaps persist; although presidential commitments aim to reduce coal, 14 GW of new coal capacity was ratified until 2030. Distributive injustices are severe, with an estimated 6,500–15,700 annual premature deaths due to coal emissions. The system exhibits carbon lock-in, projecting coal dominance until 2050. The study concludes that green regulatory stagnation results from historically constituted state-business power configurations rather than technical incapacity. Addressing informal ties between state elites and business interests is crucial. Recommendations include transparent governance designs to minimize fossil fuel dominance and accelerate progress toward the 2060 Net Zero Emission target.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.64530/ijbams.v2i1.49first seen 2026-05-17 05:20:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。