← 論文一覧に戻る

インドのエネルギー転換に向けた市場型資金調達に対する投資家認識:ONGC、NTPC、Coal Indiaの比較研究

Investor Perception of Market-Based Financing for India's Energy Transition: A Comparative Study of Ongc, Ntpc and Coal India (原題)

Vunyala Pravalika, Dr. K. Famitha Begum

International Journal of Science Engineering and Technology📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-28#気候金融Origin: JP経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23010454
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010454

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

インドの国営エネルギー企業3社(ONGC、NTPC、Coal India)を対象に、グリーンボンド、QIP、売却・放出、ESGリンク債など市場型資金調達手段に対する投資家認識を質問紙調査で比較分析した。政府支援と売却の透明性、配当利回り、ESG・サステナビリティ開示が投資家信頼に与える影響を検証。36〜45歳層や年間5万〜10万ルピー投資家が満足度テストで有意に反応し、透明性・開示強化が投資家信頼の鍵と結論づける。

English

A questionnaire-based comparative study of investor perception toward market-based financing (green bonds, QIPs, disinvestment, ESG-linked bonds) used by India's ONGC, NTPC and Coal India to fund the energy transition. It tests how government backing, disinvestment transparency, dividend yield and ESG/sustainability disclosure shape investor confidence, finding age and investment-amount groups differ significantly. Concludes that stronger transparency and disclosure are essential to sustain investor confidence in PSU energy transition financing.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ基準・有報でのサステナビリティ開示やトランジション・ファイナンスが進む中、国営企業の市場型資金調達と投資家認識の関係は示唆に富む。ただしインド固有の制度・PSU文脈が強く、日本の実務への直接適用は限定的。

In the global GX context

Adds to global transition-finance scholarship by examining how state-owned energy firms in an emerging market use green bonds, QIPs and ESG-linked instruments, and how disclosure transparency drives investor confidence. Relevant to ISSB/TCFD adoption debates in emerging economies where public-sector issuers dominate transition capital.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:新興国PSUの市場型トランジション資金調達と投資家認識の実証データを提供する。

🏢実務担当者:国営・公共系企業のIR/サステナビリティ開示チームが、透明性と投資家信頼の関係を参考にできる。

🏛政策担当者:国営企業の売却・資金調達における開示・透明性規制の設計に示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Aims: To examine investor perception of market-based financing instruments such as green bonds, Qualified Institutional Placements, Offer for Sale disinvestment and ESG-linked bonds used by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) and Coal India Limited (CIL) to fund India’s energy transition. Evaluate the influence of government backing and disinvestment transparency on investor confidence. Assess the effect of dividend yield and return expectations on investor perception. Assess the influence of ESG and sustainability disclosures on investor confidence towards the three public sector energy undertakings. Hypothesis: Demographic variables are not significantly associated with investor perception towards market-based financing instruments of ONGC, NTPC and Coal India. Approach: The purpose of the research methodology is to resolve the research problem through a scientific evaluation of the research topic, namely investor perception of market-based financing for India’s energy transition among ONGC, NTPC and Coal India investors. The term “required primary data” refers to data that is original, suitable for questionnaire-based survey procedures, and generates high accuracy through structured discussions with respondents. Secondary data for this study have already been collected for a specific purpose from annual reports, stock exchange filings, business journals, newspapers, websites and prior theses. Examination: The Test of Satisfaction towards market-based financing instruments and the Test of F values for investment amount and age furnished by the perception of investors towards ONGC, NTPC and Coal India. Nevertheless, this demonstrates that investors in the 36-45 years age group and those investing between Rs. 50,001 and Rs. 1,00,000 annually are more likely to be affected by the Test of Satisfaction regarding market-based financing instruments. In summary, market-based financing is becoming the most critical and closely watched avenue through which public sector energy undertakings raise capital for the energy transition. The “Investor Confidence Index” built on the perception of respondents towards green bonds, QIPs, disinvestment and ESG-linked instruments is the most frequently used parameter for assessing the market acceptance of PSU energy financing. Regulators and company managements are obligated to strengthen transparency and disclosure practices that optimise investor confidence. Nevertheless, market-based financing for the energy transition encounters a few obstacles during the structuring and implementation phases. The objective of this paper is to examine these obstacles in order to improve investor confidence and to determine strategies for overcoming them. Furthermore, it examines and compares investor perception across ONGC, NTPC and Coal India.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。