← 論文一覧に戻る

アルプス太陽光発電プロジェクトの主体は誰か:スイスのエネルギー民主主義に向けたステークホルダー関与の促進

Who powers alpine photovoltaic projects? Fostering stakeholder engagement for energy democracy in Switzerland (原題)

Paula Winkler, Christian Schaffner, Bianca Vienni Baptista

Energy Research & Social Science📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-27#エネルギー転換Origin: EU対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104903
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104903
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

スイスの大規模アルプス太陽光17件を対象に、計画段階(立地選定から建築許可まで)のステークホルダー関与をエネルギー民主主義の視点で分析。文書分析・協働的ステークホルダー分析・インタビュー・ワークショップを組み合わせた学際的手法を用いた。早期かつ透明な関与は信頼と実質的意見反映をもたらす一方、市町村投票後の関与低下や時間的圧力が紛争と信頼喪失を招くことを示す。エネルギー民主主義は完全な地域所有を必ずしも要さず、計画段階を通じた継続的で適時の関与に依存すると結論づける。

English

This study analyzes stakeholder engagement in the planning phase of 17 large-scale Swiss alpine photovoltaic projects through an energy democracy lens, using document analysis, collaborative stakeholder analysis, interviews, and a developer workshop. Early, transparent engagement builds trust and enables meaningful input during site selection, while late involvement and declining communication after municipal votes fuel conflict and erode trust. It concludes that energy democracy in large-scale renewables does not require full community ownership but depends on continuous, well-timed engagement throughout planning.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも再エネの地域共生・合意形成はFIT/FIP制度下の重要課題であり、市町村・住民・事業者の関与設計は太陽光・風力の適地選定や地元合意の実務に示唆を与える。SSBJや有報の開示文脈とは直接の接点は薄いが、地域ステークホルダー対応はサステナビリティ経営の社会面(S)として統合報告書の記載事項になり得る。

In the global GX context

Globally, this contributes to the social dimension of transition governance, complementing TCFD/ISSB disclosure by showing how procedural legitimacy and community engagement shape renewable project delivery. It offers empirical grounding for the 'just transition' and stakeholder-engagement expectations increasingly embedded in CSRD and transition-finance frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:エネルギー民主主義と大規模再エネの合意形成を、計画段階の関与タイミングという観点で実証的に整理した研究として参照価値がある。

🏢実務担当者:太陽光・再エネ開発の計画段階で、立地選定時の早期・継続的なステークホルダー関与が紛争回避と信頼構築に有効であることを示す。

🏛政策担当者:再エネ促進策において、市町村承認後のコミュニケーション断絶や時間的圧力が合意形成を損なう点を踏まえた制度設計が求められる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Large-scale renewable energy infrastructures are increasingly deployed in sensitive and contested landscapes, where project development depends not only on technical feasibility but also on how affected stakeholders are engaged in decision-making. Alpine photovoltaic projects in Switzerland are a particularly relevant case, as they are promoted to address energy security while raising concerns over land use, environmental protection, landscape change, and local decision-making. This study examines stakeholder engagement during the planning phase of Swiss alpine photovoltaic projects, understood as the period from site selection and municipal approval until the granting of the building permit. Using energy democracy as an analytical lens, it investigates how engagement strategies shape stakeholders' influence on large-scale renewable energy infrastructure development. This study applies a transdisciplinary methodological approach, combining document analysis, collaborative stakeholder analysis, semi-structured interviews, and a workshop with project developers across 17 large-scale alpine photovoltaic projects. The findings show a complex stakeholder landscape in which local communities, municipalities, energy utilities and project developers hold decision-making power. Engagement is uneven across project phases. Early and transparent engagement builds trust and enables meaningful input, particularly during site selection, whereas late involvement and declining communication after municipal votes lead to conflict and undermine trust. Time pressure and technical uncertainty further prioritise rapid project development over continuous engagement. The findings show that energy democracy in large-scale renewable energy projects does not necessarily require full community ownership. Instead, it depends on transparent, continuous, and well-timed stakeholder engagement throughout the planning phase.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。