Crop Residue Management for Climate-Smart Agriculture: Alternatives to Burning and Pathways to Circularity
気候スマート農業のための作物残渣管理:焼却に代わる選択肢と循環型への道筋 (AI 翻訳)
Suraj Jadhav, Sagar Kamble, Sachin Patil, Dnyaneshwar Raut, Sudarshan Shende
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、作物残渣の野焼きが気候や健康に与える影響をまとめ、代替管理手法(土壌還元、バイオ炭、堆肥化、バイオガス、エタノール等)を評価する。気候スマート農業と循環型バイオ経済の枠組みで残渣の価値化を提案するが、小農への普及には政策的・制度的課題が多いと指摘する。
English
This review synthesizes evidence on the climate and health impacts of open-field crop residue burning, evaluates alternatives (soil incorporation, biochar, composting, biogas, bioethanol, etc.), and frames residue valorization within climate-smart agriculture and circular bioeconomy. It identifies policy and knowledge barriers, especially for smallholders, and suggests governance measures for transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では稲わら焼却が問題となる地域もあるが、本論文は主に南アジア・東南アジアを対象としており、日本の農業政策(みどりの食料システム戦略)におけるバイオマス活用の参考にはなる可能性がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, crop residue burning is a major source of GHGs and air pollution, especially in South/Southeast Asia. This review provides a comprehensive overview of alternatives and circular economy integration, relevant for climate-smart agriculture policy in developing regions but less directly applicable to corporate disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of residue management options and research gaps for climate-smart agriculture and circular bioeconomy.
🏢実務担当者:May inform agricultural extension services and farm-level decision-making on alternative residue practices.
🏛政策担当者:Offers governance recommendations to shift from burning to sustainable residue management in smallholder-dominated systems.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Agricultural production generates vast quantities of crop residues annually, the management of which poses one of the most consequential yet under-addressed challenges in contemporary agri-food systems. Open-field burning remains the predominant disposal method in many low- and middle-income agricultural regions, principally across South and Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of Eastern Europe and Latin America, where logistical and economic pressures incentivise the rapid clearance of fields between cropping seasons. This review synthesises evidence from peer-reviewed literature and authoritative institutional reports, published primarily between 2000 and 2026, to characterise the scale and consequences of crop residue burning, evaluate the scientific basis for alternative management strategies, and situate residue valorisation within the dual conceptual frameworks of climate-smart agriculture and the circular bioeconomy. The principal findings indicate that open burning releases substantial quantities of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, black carbon, and fine particulate matter, with profound consequences for soil health, air quality, human respiratory health, and global climate stability. A spectrum of technically viable alternatives is examined, including in-situ residue incorporation, biochar production, composting and vermicomposting, anaerobic digestion for biogas, lignocellulosic bioethanol production, thermochemical conversion, and use as animal feed or raw industrial material. Climate-smart soil management, grounded in enhanced organic matter inputs and the stabilisation of soil carbon pools, emerges as a central strategy for simultaneously improving agricultural resilience and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. The circular bioeconomy framework provides a coherent architecture for transforming residues from waste streams into value-added products, integrating energy, nutrient, and carbon recovery within cascading use hierarchies. Significant policy, institutional, and knowledge barriers remain, however, particularly in smallholder farming systems. The review concludes by identifying critical research gaps and recommending governance measures to accelerate the transition from burning to sustainable, circular residue management.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2026/v30i61058first seen 2026-06-14 04:29:49 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。