Solidarity in Just Heating Transitions: Decarbonization Potential Through Cooperation in the Post‐Industrial City of Rotterdam
公正な暖房転換における連帯：脱工業化都市ロッテルダムの協力を通じた脱炭素の可能性 (AI 翻訳)
Erwin Van Tuijl, Yogi Hale Hendlin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、暖房転換におけるエネルギー正義とマルチステークホルダーガバナンスを組み合わせ、ロッテルダムの事例から制度的・経済的・市民的連帯の3つの様式を特定。厳格な気候目標や設置業者不足、エネルギー貧困への対応が連帯を通じた協力を促進する一方、調整不全や分配対立、制度の硬直性が実施を妨げると指摘。連帯の反復と制度的調整が公正な転換の自己組織化を支援し得ると論じる。
English
This paper combines energy justice with multi-stakeholder governance in heating transitions, using Rotterdam as a case to identify three solidarity modalities (institutional, economic, civic). It finds that strict climate goals, installer shortages, and energy poverty drive cooperation, but coordination failures, distributional conflicts, and institutional rigidity hinder implementation. It argues that iterated solidarity practices plus institutional coordination can aid self-organization in just heating transition governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、地域熱供給や家庭部門の脱炭素化が課題となる中、公正な移行（ジャスト・トランジション）の視点は政策的に重要。本論文の連帯とガバナンスの分析は、日本の自治体や地域コミュニティにおけるエネルギー転換の合意形成に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this contributes to the just transition literature by empirically linking solidarity and governance in heating transitions, relevant for cities facing similar post-industrial challenges. It offers insights for policymakers on the limits of solidarity and the need for institutional coordination, complementing TCFD/ISSB discussions with social dimensions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a framework linking energy justice and governance in heating transitions, useful for further empirical studies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights cooperation drivers and governance barriers for urban heating decarbonization projects.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes that solidarity alone is insufficient; institutional coordination is needed for just heating transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In debates on energy transition governance, heating transitions are a major factor; yet limited attention has been paid to the various justice dimensions involved. To address this gap, we combine literature on multi-stakeholder governance in heating transitions with energy justice, drawing on insights from an empirical case study of the post-industrial city of Rotterdam to identify three solidarity modalities (institutional, economic, and civic) to analyze cooperation drivers within, and governance limitations hindering, just heating transitions. Our findings reveal how collective action problems related to just heating transitions (strict climate goals, a shortage of installers, and willingness to address energy poverty) drive cooperation through solidarity initiatives by all actors. However, coordination failures, distributional conflicts, and institutional rigidity present governance challenges hindering implementation of just heating transitions, suggesting that solidarity alone is insufficient to achieve results. Nonetheless, we argue that iterated practices of solidarity together with institutional coordination can present cooperation opportunities to aid self-organization in just-heating transition governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.12308first seen 2026-08-07 05:53:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。