BRIDGING INCLUSION: BARRIERS AND ENABLERS OF GENDER AND DISABILITY RESPONSIVE COMMUNITY-BASED NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS
包摂の架け橋：ジェンダーと障害に対応したコミュニティベースの自然を基盤とする解決策の障壁と促進要因 (AI 翻訳)
Yohana Novita Diana, Harkosta Ario Sopaba, Rogasianus Alassan Mau, Citra Riandika
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
地域コミュニティベースの自然を基盤とする解決策（Cb-NbS）におけるジェンダーと障害の包摂の障壁と促進要因を体系的文献レビューで分析。土地や資源へのアクセス不平等、ジェンダー・障害に配慮しない政策、エリート・キャプチャーが排除を生む。促進要因として女性組織・障害者団体の参画、透明な利益分配、意思決定フォーラムのアクセシビリティ向上等が有効。
English
This study examines barriers and enablers for gender and disability inclusion in community-based Nature-based Solutions (Cb-NbS) via a systematic literature review. Key barriers include unequal land access, gender-blind policies, and elite capture. Enablers include strengthening women's organizations, transparent benefit-sharing, and involving disability organizations from design. Policy implications stress gender-transformative approaches and accessibility standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではNbSの導入が進むが、包摂的なガバナンスの観点はまだ十分に議論されていない。本論文は、SSBJや統合報告書における社会的側面の開示にも示唆を与えうる。
In the global GX context
As NbS gain traction globally for climate adaptation, this paper underscores the need for inclusive governance to ensure equitable outcomes. It informs ISSB's social disclosure standards and global frameworks like the Paris Agreement's adaptation goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a systematic framework to study inclusion in NbS, useful for socio-ecological research.
🏢実務担当者:Provides actionable enablers for designing inclusive NbS projects, e.g., involving women and disabled groups early.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy levers such as gender-disaggregated data and accessibility standards for NbS programs.
📄 Abstract（原文）
<ns3:p>Community-based Nature-based Solutions (Cb-NbS) are increasingly important in climate change adaptation and mitigation, yet their implementation has not provided equitable participation or fair benefit-sharing, particularly for women and persons with disabilities. This study examines the barriers and drivers of gender-disability inclusion in Cb-NbS and their implications for governance and socio-ecological outcomes. The study was conducted through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO framework, based on selected articles from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, supplemented by relevant literature. Findings indicate that exclusion is primarily driven by inequalities in land or resource access, technically “neutral” policies that lack gender and disability sensitivity, and elite capture practices. At the social level, patriarchal norms and domestic workloads limit women’s time and legitimacy, often restricting their involvement to formal participation without decision-making influence. Regarding disability, dominant barriers include accessibility (spatial and communication), lack of reasonable accommodation, and weak disaggregated data. Enabling factors consistently emerge through the strengthening of women’s organizations and leadership, transparent accountability and benefit-sharing mechanisms, and the involvement of organizations of persons with disabilities from the design stage. Suggested policy implications emphasize a gender-transformative approach: ensuring access or tenure prerequisites and benefit control for women, designing decision-making forums to be safe and compatible with care burdens (flexible schedules, childcare support), establishing accessibility standards as program requirements, and mandating gender and disability-disaggregated data for monitoring benefit equity.</ns3:p>
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179292.1first seen 2026-06-17 05:26:50 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:13:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。