Green and climate finance research trends: A bibliometric study of pre- and post-pandemic shifts
グリーンおよび気候変動資金の研究動向：パンデミック前後の変化に関する計量書誌学的研究 (AI 翻訳)
Azhar Mohamad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、1997年から2024年までの1039件の論文を対象に、グリーンファイナンスと気候変動資金に関する研究動向を計量書誌学的に分析。2020年以降の研究量増加、中国の研究ハブ化、テーマの移行（適応・食料安全保障からグリーンファイナンス・再生可能エネルギー・SDGsへ）を明らかにした。気候変動資金、特に適応戦略の研究ギャップを指摘し、政策立案への示唆を提供。
English
This bibliometric study analyzes 1039 papers (1997-2024) on green and climate finance, revealing a post-2020 surge in research, China's emergence as a collaboration hub, and a thematic shift from adaptation/food security to green finance, renewable energy, and SDGs. It identifies a research gap in climate finance, especially adaptation strategies, and offers policy insights for integrating green finance into economic recovery.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、グリーントランスフォーメーション（GX）推進に伴い、グリーンファイナンスの研究動向把握が重要。本論文は国際的な研究トレンドを示し、日本のGX政策や投資戦略の方向性を検討する際の参考となる。特に、気候変動資金の適応戦略における研究不足は、日本の適応策強化の必要性を示唆。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a global overview of green and climate finance research trends, relevant to international frameworks like TCFD, ISSB, and transition finance. It highlights the growing importance of green finance post-pandemic and identifies research gaps in climate adaptation, which is critical for global disclosure and investment strategies. The findings support the integration of green finance into economic recovery plans.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies thematic shifts and research gaps in green and climate finance, guiding future research directions.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into global research trends and collaboration networks, useful for corporate sustainability strategy and investment decisions.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for strategic investments in green finance and integration into economic recovery frameworks, informing policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Green and climate finance are critical for solving global climate concerns and promoting sustainable development. However, research gaps remain in identifying theme shifts and regional discrepancies, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study undertakes a bibliometric analysis of 1039 Scopus papers published between 1997 and 2024, utilising tools including Bibliomagika, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny to look at co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic clusters. The findings emphasise a significant increase in research output following 2020, which indicates the increasing significance of sustainable financial mechanisms. China is becoming a global centre for research collaboration, while journals such as Environmental Science and Pollution Research are the most prolific in terms of publications and citations. Thematic analysis indicates a transition from adaptation and food security prior to the pandemic to green finance, renewable energy, and sustainable development goals during the pandemic. Nevertheless, climate finance has a substantial research gap, particularly in adaptation strategies. The study emphasises the necessity of strategic investments in green financial mechanisms and the integration of green finance into economic recovery frameworks, providing policymakers with actionable insights. The key to leveraging green and climate finance to achieve a sustainable, resilient future is to enhance interdisciplinary research and foster equitable global collaboration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100098first seen 2026-05-05 19:06:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。