再生可能電力システムのための先進エネルギー貯蔵技術：包括的レビュー
Advanced energy storage technologies for renewable power systems: a comprehensive review (原題)
Tole Sutikno, Ahmad Raditya Cahya Baswara, Watra Arsadiando, Hendril Satrian Purnama, Mohd Hatta Jopri
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、2011年から2025年までの研究を対象に、電気化学、機械、熱、水素ベースのエネルギー貯蔵技術を、往復効率、均等化貯蔵コスト、サイクル寿命、技術成熟度の4つの指標で比較評価する。リチウムイオン電池は成熟度と効率が最も高く、ナトリウムイオン電池はコスト削減の可能性を示す。揚水発電や圧縮空気貯蔵は大規模用途に適し、水素貯蔵は季節間バランスに有効である。TRL指向の比較フレームワークを統合し、技術選択の意思決定を支援する。
English
This review evaluates electrochemical, mechanical, thermal, and hydrogen-based energy storage technologies using four metrics: round-trip efficiency, levelized cost of storage, cycle life, and technology readiness level. Lithium-ion batteries show highest maturity and efficiency, while sodium-ion batteries offer cost reduction potential. Pumped hydro and CAES suit large-scale applications; hydrogen storage enables seasonal balancing. The TRL-oriented framework supports informed technology selection.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の再生可能エネルギー導入拡大に伴い、系統安定化のための蓄電技術の選択肢を体系的に比較する本レビューは、今後のエネルギー政策や電力会社の設備計画に示唆を与える。特に、技術成熟度と経済性を統合した評価は、日本の長期的なエネルギー戦略の検討に有用である。
In the global GX context
This review provides a systematic techno-economic comparison of energy storage technologies, relevant for global grid integration of renewables. The TRL-oriented framework aids policymakers and utilities in technology selection, aligning with global energy transition goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive comparative framework for energy storage technologies, useful for further research on hybrid systems.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a structured evaluation to guide investment decisions in energy storage for renewable projects.
🏛政策担当者:Informs technology-neutral policies for energy storage deployment to support renewable integration.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The accelerating deployment of renewable energy, particularly solar and wind power, has intensified the need for advanced energy storage systems (ESS) to address intermittency and enhance grid reliability. However, existing reviews often provide fragmented technology comparisons without a unified techno-economic framework for systematic evaluation. This paper presents a comprehensive review of studies published between 2011 and 2025, examining electrochemical, mechanical, thermal, and hydrogen-based energy storage technologies using four standardized metrics: round-trip efficiency (RTE), levelized cost of storage (LCOS), cycle life, and technology readiness level (TRL). Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) demonstrate the highest maturity and efficiency (RTE: 90–95% and LCOS: 120–200 USD/MWh), whereas sodium-ion batteries offer promising cost reductions of 30–40% through abundant materials and scalable manufacturing. Pumped hydro and compressed air energy storage (CAES) remain suitable for largescale applications owing to their long service life and scalability, while thermal energy storage (TES) provides cost-effective long-duration storage for concentrated solar power (CSP). Hydrogen-based storage, despite lower RTE (25–45%), offers unique advantages for seasonal energy balancing. Unlike previous reviews, this study integrates techno-economic performance with technology maturity through a TRL-oriented comparative framework, enabling systematic technology assessment based on deployment readiness, economic viability, scalability, and application suitability, thereby supporting informed decision-making and future hybrid energy storage development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/22241207first seen 2026-09-02 04:24:40 · last seen 2026-09-03 04:37:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。