Two Paths to Climate Neutrality: Divergent Energy Strategies of Portugal and Slovakia
気候中立への二つの道：ポルトガルとスロバキアの分岐するエネルギー戦略 (AI 翻訳)
Miroslava Farkas Smitkova, David Kompan, Florinda Martins
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ポルトガル（再生可能エネルギー重視）とスロバキア（原子力ベース）の低炭素戦略を比較。STEM学生への調査（n=133）で、家庭のエネルギー構成や太陽光導入率の地域差を確認。将来の技術者が持続可能性と経済性のトレードオフを認識し、移行コストを政府責任と捉える傾向を示した。
English
This pilot study compares the low-carbon strategies of Portugal (renewable-focused) and Slovakia (nuclear-based) through a survey of 133 STEM students. It finds regional disparities in household energy mixes and solar adoption. Future engineers are aware of sustainability-economy trade-offs and largely view transition costs as a government responsibility.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は欧州二国の対照的な低炭素戦略を比較しており、日本のエネルギー政策における多様な選択肢（再生可能エネルギー vs 原子力）の検討に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This comparative study highlights how different national energy contexts shape student attitudes, offering insights for countries designing their own climate-neutrality pathways and workforce education.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A comparative analysis of two EU countries' low-carbon strategies, useful for studying how national energy portfolios affect attitudes of future engineers.
🏢実務担当者:Limited direct applicability due to small sample, but emphasizes the need to align workforce training with local energy transition specifics.
🏛政策担当者:Reveals STEM students' perceptions of transition costs and responsibility, which can inform policy communication and education strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving climate neutrality by 2050 requires strategic shifts in national energy portfolios tailored to specific geographical and socio-political conditions. This study examines the divergent low-carbon trajectories of Portugal, characterized by variable renewable integration, and Slovakia, defined by a robust nuclear baseload, through the perspectives of STEM students who will lead the energy transition. The rationale for comparing these two countries lies in their contrasting low-carbon strategies, which provide a natural setting for examining how divergent national energy systems shape the attitudes of a technically educated cohort largely overlooked in previous research yet responsible for implementing the transition. Data were collected through an online survey (n = 133) at technical universities in Bratislava and Porto. Results indicate regional disparities in household energy mixes, notably higher wood burning in Slovakia (12%) than Portugal (<1%). Slovak respondents reported higher residential solar adoption (63.6% of solar users), possibly associated with higher homeownership (93%) and energy-crisis pressures, despite Portugal’s superior solar irradiance. Although limited by sample size, this pilot assessment shows that future engineers navigate trade-offs between sustainability and economic viability and view transition costs largely as a governmental responsibility. These findings inform the alignment of urban energy policies with the next generation’s readiness.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10070388first seen 2026-07-30 05:18:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。