公平で危機に強いエネルギーの未来の設計：気候脆弱地域における分散型エネルギーシステム、デジタル技術、適応的政策枠組みの統合
Designing Equitable and Crisis-Resilient Energy Futures: Integrating Decentralized Energy Systems, Digital Technologies and Adaptive Policy Frameworks in Climate-Vulnerable Contexts (原題)
Uzonna Olive Mmonu, Olawale Idowu Babalola
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ナイジェリア、ケニア、インドの比較事例分析を通じて、分散型エネルギーシステム、デジタル技術、適応的政策の統合的発展が、気候脆弱地域における公平で危機に強いエネルギー移行に不可欠であることを示す。ケニアの進歩的なミニグリッドとPAYGデジタルプラットフォームの成功を基に、社会技術的適応フレームワークを提案する。
English
This study compares Nigeria, Kenya, and India to show that equitable and crisis-resilient energy transitions in climate-vulnerable regions require the synergistic co-evolution of decentralized energy systems, digital technologies, and adaptive policies. Kenya's success with mini-grids and pay-as-you-go platforms informs a socio-technical-adaptive framework for integrated solutions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策は途上国支援や国際協力を重視しており、本研究成果は日本のODAやJICAのエネルギーアクセス事業に示唆を与える。また、国内の再生可能エネルギー導入やデジタル技術活用の政策設計にも参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global energy transition scholarship by providing empirical evidence from the Global South on integrating decentralized renewables, digital platforms, and adaptive governance. It offers policy insights for international development agencies and investors focusing on energy access and climate resilience.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for studying socio-technical transitions in climate-vulnerable contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights successful models like Kenya's mini-grids and PAYG platforms for replication in other regions.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for adaptive policies that integrate technological, digital, and institutional factors.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The challenges of sustainable development in the climate-vulnerable areas of the Global South are acute because of climate change and the presence of tenacious energy poverty. This paper explores how the convergence of decentralized energy systems, digital technologies and adaptive policy frameworks can produce equitable and crisis-resilient energy results. The study will employ a qualitative comparative case study design and will analyze policy documents, regulatory frameworks, international reports and secondary datasets of Nigeria, Kenya and India. The three countries have been chosen due to their common exposure to climate risks and the different degrees of decentralized renewable implementation, digital maturity and policy adaptability.In-case and cross-case analysis demonstrate that equitable and crisis-resistant energy futures could only be developed as a result of the synergistic co-evolution of the three pillars. Kenya has the best results, with progressive mini-grids, pay-as-you-go digital platforms, adaptive governance driving electrification to about 80% and increasing resilience to climate shocks. Nigeria has encouraging regulatory development and mini-grid growth yet is limited by finite digitalization. India is very close to achieving universal access with hybrid strategies but needs more procedural justice protection. The research forms a coherent socio-technical-adaptive framework that outlines the required conditions for a successful alignment within the framework of decentralized infrastructure, digital intelligence and flexible governance.The results contribute to the socio-technical systems theory, thinking of resilience, energy justice and adaptive governance scholarship. They provide practical policy proposals to scale from climate-vulnerable situations to integrated solutions. Finally, the study highlights the importance of designed integration of technological, digital, and institutional factors, not targeted interventions, in order to achieve fair and resilient energy transitions in the Global South.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.54536/jsere.v2i2.7834first seen 2026-08-28 04:32:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。