エネルギー転換における政治的信頼の決定的役割
The critical role of political trust in the energy transition (原題)
Jordana W. Composto, Sofía Silvosa, Anandita Sabherwal, Elke U. Weber
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、政府・開発事業者・地域コミュニティ・規制当局間の「政治的信頼」がエネルギー転換プロジェクトの成否を左右する仕組みを、文献レビューと15のケース分析、専門家調査・ワークショップで検証する。信頼の構築・維持・侵食・修復のプロセスと非対称性を整理し、信頼が障壁にも成功への経路にもなることを示す。プロジェクト設計やステークホルダー関与、政策実施への含意を提示する。
English
This multidisciplinary review examines how political trust—trust between actors with unequal power—shapes energy transition outcomes. Drawing on a narrative literature review, fifteen case studies, stakeholder surveys, and expert workshops, it maps key trust dyads (government-community, developer-community, regulator-developer) and shows how trust-building, erosion, and repair processes differ and are asymmetric. Findings inform project design, stakeholder engagement, and policy implementation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では洋上風力や再エネ立地をめぐる地域合意形成がGX推進のボトルネックとなっており、事業者と地域・自治体の信頼構築はSSBJ開示以前の実務課題として重要。ステークホルダー・エンゲージメントの質が移行金融や事業許認可の前提となる点を示唆する。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD disclosure expands to social capital and stakeholder engagement, this paper offers evidence that trust is a material, outcome-determining factor in transition projects—relevant to transition finance and just-transition framing globally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:信頼をエネルギー転換の因果メカニズムとして扱う分析枠組みとケース証拠を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ・インフラ事業の地域合意形成とステークホルダー関与戦略の設計に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:許認可・政策実施における信頼構築と紛争予防の制度的設計に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving net‐zero CO 2 emissions requires sustained collaboration between civil society and the private and public sectors across time and geographies, but low trust in and among these actors impedes coordinated action. This multidisciplinary review examines how different forms of trust, in particular political trust (i.e., trust between actors with differential power), shape the energy transition, addressing four core questions: How does trust impact energy project development and outcomes? How do the processes of building, maintaining, eroding, and repairing trust differ? What are the asymmetries in trust gain and loss? How does a project's history and stage determine which process is at play and whether trust repair is possible? A narrative literature review and analysis of fifteen case studies spanning diverse energy contexts identifies key trust dyads: government‐community, developer‐community, regulator‐developer. Mapping these trust dyads on project outcomes reveals when trust functions as either a barrier or a pathway to success. We complement our literature review and case analysis with primary data from stakeholder surveys and expert workshops that validate the real‐world relevance of trust research insights and identify the largest trust deficits and effective trust‐building strategies perceived by expert practitioners. Our findings across sources of evidence converge to show that political trust operates through distinct mechanisms across different actor relationships, with direct implications for project design, stakeholder engagement, and policy implementation. The review concludes by outlining future research directions and opportunities for cross‐disciplinary collaboration to address trust challenges in the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/pops.70218first seen 2026-11-07 05:30:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。