gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Benefits of Cycling Infrastructure: Insights from Existing Research

自転車インフラの温室効果ガス削減効果:既存研究からの知見 (AI 翻訳)

Muhammad Sajjad Ansar, Raktim Mitra

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-30#エネルギー転換Origin: Global
DOI: 10.3390/su18094414
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094414

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、自転車インフラの温室効果ガス(GHG)削減効果に関する既存研究を体系的にレビューした。17件の研究を分析し、自転車は運行時排出の削減に大きく寄与するが、インフラ建設や維持に伴う排出が効果を相殺する可能性があることを示した。モードシフト分析が主要手法であり、大規模インフラ整備におけるGHG削減ポテンシャルを明らかにしている。

English

This paper systematically reviews 17 studies on the GHG mitigation benefits of cycling infrastructure. It finds that cycling significantly reduces operational emissions, but embodied emissions from infrastructure installation and maintenance can negate some benefits. Mode shift analysis is the dominant approach, highlighting the potential of large-scale cycling infrastructure for urban decarbonization.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でもシェアサイクルや自転車レーン整備が進む中、本レビューは都市交通の脱炭素化における自転車インフラの定量的効果を整理しており、政策立案や投資判断の参考となる。

In the global GX context

As cities globally invest in cycling infrastructure, this literature review provides a consolidated assessment of GHG mitigation potentials and trade-offs, supporting urban transport decarbonization strategies aligned with climate targets.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of existing evidence on cycling infrastructure's GHG impacts, identifying research gaps such as lifecycle assessments and long-term behavioral effects.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for urban planners and sustainability teams on the potential and limitations of cycling infrastructure for corporate or municipal carbon reduction goals.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for integrated policies that consider both operational benefits and infrastructure emissions, informing transport and climate action plans.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Cycling is widely recognized as a sustainable urban mobility solution, and many municipalities focus on cycling infrastructure expansion to promote improved environmental sustainability. However, the current literature on cycling has predominantly focused on safety and health benefits, while the environmental benefits including GHG mitigation benefits remain less explored. To summarize findings from the current literature that explore the GHG emissions-related benefits (or costs) of cycling infrastructure, we conducted a literature review using five major scientific databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 824 screened records, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were published in the last decade, reflecting a limited but growing interest in this topic. The current analytical approaches include mode shift analysis, life cycle assessment, and scenario modelling. Among these, mode shift analysis (i.e., assessing the potential benefits related to replacement of car trips with cycling) remains a commonly used method. We found that cycling offers significant operational benefits by reducing GHG emissions, especially in the context of large-scale expansions of cycling infrastructure. Existing research indicates that even when embodied emissions are considered, bicycle is a more sustainable mode of transportation compared to cars or even public transit. However, emissions associated with installation and maintenance of cycling infrastructure may sometimes negate the GHG benefits associated with additional cycling. We discussed gaps in the current literature and directions for future research.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。