自然基盤ソリューションとしての都市農業：インドネシア・タンゲラン県における比較ガバナンスモデル
Urban Farming as Nature-Based Solutions: Comparative Governance Models from Tangerang Regency, Indonesia (原題)
Rahmi Elsa Diana, Eduwin Eko Franjaya, Septi Maulidyah, Gilig Setyo Rahardjo, Virgi Nanca Lorizkian, Nixia Stephanie, Farell Bertram Candra, Narisha Aliyah Chelsea Subhan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドネシアのタンゲラン県における3つの都市農業モデル（民間、政府、コミュニティ）を比較し、自然基盤ソリューション（NbS）としての性能を評価した。ガバナンス構造が環境教育、生物多様性、社会的包摂、食料安全保障に与える影響を明らかにし、都市農業が自動的にNbSとして機能するわけではないと結論付けた。
English
This study compares three urban farming governance models (private, governmental, community-based) in Tangerang Regency, Indonesia, to assess their performance as Nature-Based Solutions (NbS). It finds that governance structures shape environmental education, biodiversity awareness, social inclusion, and food security, concluding that urban farming does not automatically function as an NbS.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、都市農業は食料安全保障や地域コミュニティの観点から注目されるが、NbSとしての位置づけはまだ発展途上である。本論文は、ガバナンスモデルがNbS性能に与える影響を示すことで、日本の都市計画や農業政策におけるNbS導入の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, NbS are gaining traction in climate adaptation and biodiversity strategies. This paper contributes by empirically linking governance models to NbS performance, offering insights for policymakers and urban planners seeking to implement effective NbS.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for evaluating NbS governance, useful for urban sustainability research.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights how governance choices affect outcomes, informing urban farming project design.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that NbS policies should consider governance models to achieve socio-ecological goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Urban farming is increasingly being examined as a Nature-Based Solution (NbS) that is globally recognized in addressing food security, environmental degradation, and social well-being. However, empirical evidence shows that NbS performance highly depends on the governance model. The governance structures in urban farming are reflected in management priorities and influence ecological awareness and the level of social inclusivity. Aims: This study analyses three distinct governance models and their roles in shaping NbS performance. The comparison of governance models identifies NbS contributions, constraints and overall performance. Methodology and results: The research uses a qualitative comparative analysis. Three urban farming initiatives in Tangerang Regency were selected as case studies to represent different governance models; private, governmental, and community-based systems. The cases include Kebun Kumara, Kebun BRMP/Balitsa, and KWT Curug Kulon. Each case was analysed using governance-related indicators, including operational routines, plant diversity, cultivation systems, distribution mechanisms, and public benefits. Data were collected through field observations, semi-structured interviews, and archival reviews. The findings show that urban farming cannot automatically function as an NbS. Governance models influence the overall socio-ecological performance. The private model is strongly associated with environmental education and biodiversity awareness. The governmental model prioritizes research and agricultural productivity. Meanwhile, the community-based model reflects stronger social inclusion and local food security contributions. Conclusion, significance and impact study: This research positions urban farming not only as a food-production activity, but also as a socio-ecological governance system within the NbS framework.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v9i2.25438first seen 2026-08-23 04:49:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。