Weaving Indigenous temporalities in energy transitions: reflections from the cracks
エネルギー転換における先住民の時間性を織り込む：亀裂からの考察 (AI 翻訳)
Carolina Sánchez De Jaegher
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、脱植民地政治経済学とエネルギー正義の観点から、現代のエネルギー転換言説における先住民の認識論の重要性を論じる。主流の再生可能エネルギーへの移行が植民地的・収奪的関係を再生産することを批判し、土地との相互関係に基づく多元的なエネルギー正義を提唱する。また、「亀裂」という概念を用いて、持続可能性や正義といった支配的な語彙を再考する方法論を提示する。
English
This paper argues that dominant energy transition approaches often reproduce colonial and extractivist relations despite being framed as sustainable. It advocates integrating Indigenous epistemologies through localized, plural energy justice grounded in reciprocal relationships with the land. The concept of 'cracks' is introduced as a decolonial methodology to rethink sustainability and justice vocabularies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではアイヌ民族など先住民の視点がエネルギー政策に反映されにくいが、本論文はSSBJやGX実現に向けた包摂的対話の必要性を示唆する。
In the global GX context
As ISSB and CSRD push for just transition disclosures, this paper challenges mainstream sustainability frameworks by centering Indigenous temporalities and land relations, offering a critical lens for global energy justice scholarship.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a decolonial framework for energy justice studies, useful for critiquing mainstream transition narratives.
🏢実務担当者:Limited direct application, but may inform community engagement strategies for renewable projects.
🏛政策担当者:Encourages inclusion of Indigenous voices in just transition policies and cautions against extractivist greenwashing.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article examines how Indigenous relational epistemologies could further challenge dominant understandings of justice and sustainability in contemporary energy transition discourses. Drawing on decolonial political ecology, Energy Justice (EJ), Climate Environmental Justice (CEJ), and Indigenous environmental thought, it argues that dominant approaches to renewable energy transitions often reproduce colonial and extractivist relations despite being framed as sustainable and progressive. It advocates integrating Indigenous epistemologies into energy transition debates through localized and plural approaches to energy justice grounded in the lived realities of communities across the Global South and North. The article highlights the pedagogical role of the land in shaping just and sustainable futures while critically examining the romanticization and epistemic extraction of Indigenous knowledge within sustainability discourse. It develops the concept of 'cracks' as a decolonial methodological pathways for rethinking dominant vocabularies of sustainability, transition, and justice. While recognizing capitalism as a key driver of climate change, it questions whether terms such as 'radical and transformative liberation' adequately reflect Indigenous and marginalized struggles. By foregrounding reciprocity and complementarity, the article advances a relational understanding of energy justice grounded in multiple temporalities and reciprocal relationships with the land, fostering more inclusive, territorially grounded and socially just energy futures for diverse communities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2695174first seen 2026-07-28 05:01:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。