低炭素持続可能性のための資源収入管理：アジア経済におけるグリーンファイナンス、教育、ガバナンスの調整的役割
Managing resource rents for low-carbon sustainability: the moderating roles of green finance, education and governance in Asian economies (原題)
Ishtiaq Mainuddin, Partha Acharjee, Eva Chowdhury
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
アジア22カ国のパネルデータ（2001-2022年）を用い、天然資源収入（NRR）とCO2排出の関係を動的パネル推定で分析。NRRは排出を増加させるが、グリーンファイナンスとガバナンスの質がその影響を緩和することを実証。教育は逆説的に排出を増加させる結果となり、教育インフラのエネルギー集約性を示唆。
English
Using panel data from 22 Asian countries (2001-2022), this study examines the resource rent-CO2 emissions nexus. Findings show that natural resource rents increase emissions, but green finance and governance quality moderate this effect. Education paradoxically increases emissions, suggesting energy-intensive educational infrastructure. The study integrates resource curse, green finance, human capital, and institutional theories.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
アジアの資源依存経済における排出削減政策に示唆を与える。日本は資源輸入国だが、アジアへの投資・協力においてグリーンファイナンスとガバナンス強化の重要性を認識できる。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global discourse on resource curse and climate policy, highlighting the role of green finance and governance in mitigating emissions. Relevant for international climate finance and governance frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on moderating effects of green finance and governance on resource rent-emissions nexus in Asia.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of green finance and governance in corporate sustainability strategies in resource-dependent economies.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that strengthening green finance and governance can mitigate environmental impacts of resource extraction.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose This study empirically investigates the natural resource rents (NRR)-CO2 emissions nexus in Asian countries, coupled with the moderating effects of green finance (GF), education (EDU) and governance quality (GQ). Design/methodology/approach The study uses a panel dataset (2001–2022) of 22 Asian countries for empirical analysis and employs a dynamic panel estimation framework with robustness analyses to evaluate the NRR-CO2 emissions relationship and the moderating roles of GF, EDU and GQ. The findings are interpreted through the resource curse hypothesis (RCH), green finance theory (GFT), human capital theory (HCT) and institutional theory (IT). Findings The empirical results indicate that greater NRR leads to more CO2 emissions, which provides empirical support for the RCH from an Asian viewpoint. GF and GQ significantly weaken the positive association between NRR and CO2 emissions, suggesting that stronger financial and institutional frameworks can mitigate the environmental pressures associated with NRR. In contrast, EDU exhibits a positive direct and moderating association with CO2 emissions. It reveals an unexpected education paradox in which improvements in educational development are not automatically translated into environmental sustainability, potentially reflecting the energy-intensive expansion of educational infrastructure and broader economic activities. Originality/value This is one of the pioneering studies that assesses the moderating effects of GF, EDU and GQ on NRR-CO2 emissions, particularly in economies where environmental and resource rent issues are pressing. Furthermore, the study is the first to provide broader theoretical insights through innovatively integrating the RCH with theories on GFT, HCT and IT.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/msar-12-2025-0525first seen 2026-08-30 04:41:18
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。