← 論文一覧に戻る

湖上における持続可能な浮体式太陽光発電導入のためのステークホルダー認識とAHP一対比較

Stakeholder perceptions and AHP pairwise comparisons for sustainable floating photovoltaic deployment on lakes (原題)

Ilgen, Konstantin, Schindler, Dirk, Gölz, Sebastian, Gfüllner, Leonhard, Lange, Jens

Zenodoデータセット2026-10-29#再生可能エネルギーOrigin: EU対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23769697
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/23769697

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

湖上浮体式太陽光発電（FPV）の導入に対するステークホルダー認識と、持続可能性6基準の重み付けを導くAHP一対比較の調査データセット。専門家・学生・非専門家から183件の回答を収集し、水質・水量・熱特性・発電収益・利用競合・景観の各基準を評価。ドイツ・オランダ・スイスの3湖でのMCDA研究を支える。

English

An anonymised survey dataset (183 responses) capturing stakeholder perceptions of floating photovoltaic (FPV) deployment on lakes and AHP pairwise comparisons across six sustainability criteria (water quality, water balance, thermal characteristics, electricity yield, usage competition, landscape impact). It underpins an MCDA study linking public perception to sustainable surface coverage optima at three European lakes in Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でもため池・ダム湖での浮体式太陽光はFIT時代から導入が進み、地域合意と景観・水利用との調整が課題。社会受容性と多基準評価を組み合わせる手法は、国内の再エネ立地合意形成や自治体の導入計画に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As floating solar scales globally, integrating stakeholder-derived weights into siting decisions speaks to emerging expectations around social acceptance and nature-related considerations in transition planning, complementing TCFD/ISSB-adjacent nature and community disclosures.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:社会受容性とMCDAを統合するFPV評価の再現可能なデータとAHP設計の参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:浮体式太陽光の立地選定でステークホルダー重み付けを組み込む際の手法例として活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:湖沼・水域での再エネ導入における合意形成と景観・水利用調整の政策的論点を整理する材料になる。

📄 Abstract（原文）

This dataset contains anonymised stakeholder survey responses collected to investigate perceptions of floating photovoltaic (FPV) deployment and to derive criterion weights for an integrated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) of sustainable FPV lake coverage. The questionnaire combined two components: Stakeholder perception assessment: Questions addressing the perceived contribution of FPV to the energy transition and climate change mitigation, as well as potential conflicts with existing lake uses and landscape aesthetics. Scenario-based questions were used to identify individual acceptance thresholds for FPV deployment. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Fifteen pairwise comparisons among six sustainability criteria using Saaty's 1–9 scale. The criteria covered three ecological aspects (water quality, water balance and thermal lake characteristics), one economic aspect (electricity yield and economic performance) and two social aspects (usage competition and landscape impact). The dataset comprises 183 anonymised survey responses from experts, students and non-experts. Of these, 182 contain complete AHP pairwise comparison matrices. The dataset retains the incomplete response for transparency. The data are provided as a UTF-8 encoded CSV file with 37 variables. An accompanying metadata dictionary documents the variable definitions, response coding, pairwise comparison structure and handling of missing values. Research context The survey data support the study Sustainable Floating Solar Deployment on Lakes: Linking Public Perception and Site Suitability through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis . The study integrates stakeholder-derived criterion weights with site-specific ecological, economic and social sustainable surface coverage (SSC) optima for three European water bodies: Lake Leimersheim (Germany), Lake Sekdoorn (Netherlands) and Lake Toules (Switzerland). The present dataset contains the questionnaire responses rather than the underlying lake monitoring measurements or complete model outputs. Related dataset FPV monitoring data associated with the research are available separately on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21156967 Data reuse The dataset can support further analyses of stakeholder preferences, AHP consistency, sustainability criteria and social acceptance of floating photovoltaic systems. Respondent identifiers have been randomly assigned for publication, and directly identifying personal information is not included in the published variable set. Users should consult the accompanying metadata dictionary for details of the response coding and methodological limitations.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。