エネルギー転換における正義：ナイジェリアの国家能力と重要インフラの政治
Justice in the Energy Transition: State Capacity and the Politics of Critical Infrastructure in Nigeria (原題)
Fikayo Akeredolu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、ナイジェリアのMission 300国家エネルギー協定とNDC 3.0が正義をどのように概念化・運用するかを比較分析する。両プログラムは正義を制度化せず、単に表明するに留まり、脆弱層への配慮や参加メカニズムが欠如していると論じる。結論として、正義を設計制約として扱い、連邦・州政府間の調整と改革の順序付けが必要と提言する。
English
This article compares Nigeria's Mission 300 National Energy Compact and NDC 3.0, arguing that both articulate justice without institutionalizing it. It finds few mechanisms for affordability, participation, or protection of vulnerable groups, and concludes that justice must be treated as a design constraint with coordinated federal-state reform sequencing.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、エネルギー転換における公正な移行（ジャスト・トランジション）の議論は、地域雇用や石炭依存地域の対策として関連する。本稿の「正義を設計制約として扱う」視点は、日本のエネルギー政策や地域振興策に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this contributes to energy justice scholarship by showing how policy documents can fail to institutionalize justice, relevant for countries designing just transition frameworks under the Paris Agreement and SDGs.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a framework for analyzing justice in energy transition policies, applicable to other resource-dependent states.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for concrete mechanisms to ensure affordability and participation in energy projects.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes treating justice as a design constraint and coordinating across government levels.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy transitions in resource-dependent states are governance problems as well as technical ones. This article examines how Nigeria’s Mission 300 National Energy Compact and its updated Nationally Determined Contribution 3.0 conceptualise and operationalise justice, and how domestic dynamics shape whether justice is delivered. Drawing on energy justice scholarship, the political economy of rentier states, and the literature on state capacity, the article argues that the two programmes are best understood as products of different institutional lineages: one rooted in electricity-sector reform and investor-oriented stabilisation, the other in climate governance and vulnerability discourse. Using a comparative reading of both policy documents alongside governance and sector data, the analysis shows that both programmes only articulate justice rather than institutionalise it. Mission 300 prioritises grid reinforcement, loss reduction, metering, subsidy reform, and private-sector mobilisation, while offering few mechanisms for affordability, participation, or the protection of vulnerable groups. Nationally Determined Contribution 3.0 recognises gendered burdens, spatial inequality, and climate vulnerability, but provides limited instruments to embed these concerns in electricity-sector reform. The article concludes that Nigeria’s transition produces injustice not by design but through an inherited and fragmented governance structure. Addressing it requires treating justice as a design constraint, building coordination across federal and state government, and sequencing reform so households experience benefits alongside costs rather than long after them.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.12241first seen 2026-08-27 04:56:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。