Green finance or financing green? Bridging the EU’s sustainable-finance and capital-market architectures
グリーンファイナンスか、グリーンへの資金調達か？EUの持続可能な金融と資本市場のアーキテクチャを橋渡しする (AI 翻訳)
Rebecca Christie
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、EUの持続可能な金融政策と資本市場政策の統合不足を批判する。開示ルールの過度な複雑さやグローバル基準との乖離が問題であり、技術的課題の解決、資産クラスの多様化、ダブルマテリアリティの縮小などを提言する。EUの経験は日本を含む他地域への教訓となる。
English
This paper critiques the EU's failure to integrate sustainable finance with capital markets policy. It argues that disclosure rules are overly complex and diverge from global standards, and recommends prioritizing technical fixes, diversifying asset classes beyond green bonds, and reducing double materiality to align with ISSB. The EU's experience offers lessons for Japan and other jurisdictions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はSSBJ基準の策定中であり、ダブルマテリアリティの扱いが国際的な議論となっている。EUの政策評価は、日本の持続可能な金融政策の方向性を考える上で参考になる。特に、開示の簡素化や国際整合性の重要性は、日本企業のグローバルな情報開示にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper is a timely critique of the EU's sustainable finance approach, just as the ISSB standards are gaining global traction. It highlights the tension between local regulatory complexity and global interoperability, a key issue for jurisdictions like Japan adopting ISSB. The recommendation to scale back double materiality is particularly relevant for debates on materiality in climate disclosure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a policy-level critique of the EU's sustainable finance architecture, useful for comparative research on disclosure regimes.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the compliance burden of EU disclosure rules and implications for companies operating in or with the EU.
🏛政策担当者:Offers specific recommendations for simplifying sustainable finance regulation and aligning with global standards.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The European Union has not done a good job of integrating its green goals with its overall approach to finance. Sustainability disclosure and capital markets policy are too separate, even though they both operate in the same global environment. Projects that help the climate transition need money, meaning they need optimal market conditions as well as environmental credentials. Connecting market and green-finance policies would help. At their best, sustainable finance disclosures are used by companies for self-assessment, peer comparison and aligning business models with the needs of the green transition. This, in turn, can lead to innovation, jobs and growth, and more care for the natural environment. At their worst, these disclosures become compliance burdens, demanding tremendous resources to produce data that is little used. EU efforts to simplify sustainable finance rules have not reduced complexity or reconciled the EU’s departures from global sustainable finance standards. To make its sustainable finance policy more fit for purpose, the EU should prioritise the solving of technical challenges; look beyond green bonds to equities, venture capital and other asset classes; use guarantees and subsidies sparingly to incentivise investment and market tools such as securitisation; reduce the role of the EU taxonomy and simplify data collection; and pare back the role of so-called double materiality so that EU rules can be more compatible with global standards, such as those developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.64153/otef4683first seen 2026-06-21 05:59:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。