心の隙間：ドイツの陸上風力に対する地域住民態度の政治的・空間的分断
Gaps in mind: Political and spatial cleavages in local onshore wind attitudes in Germany (原題)
Jörg Radtke
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ドイツNRW州の代表調査(N=6284)を用い、陸上風力への受容を規定する要因を分析。政治志向が最も強い相関を示し、学歴・年齢の効果は弱く、都市・農村の直接効果も他要因を統制すると小さい。科学者・計画当局への信頼と手続き的・分配的公正の認識が支持と強く正相関し、農村部では信頼と公正な制度設計が特に重要となる。対面型参加、信頼できる情報仲介、立地基準と利益配分の明示を提言する。
English
Using a representative NRW survey (N=6284), this study identifies drivers of onshore wind acceptance in Germany. Political orientation is by far the strongest correlate; education and age show weak gradients, and the direct urban-rural effect is small once other factors are controlled. Trust in scientists and planning authorities and perceived procedural/distributive fairness strongly predict support, with trust and fairness especially consequential in rural areas. The authors recommend co-designed face-to-face participation, credible information intermediaries, and explicit, enforceable siting and revenue-sharing rules.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも再エネ導入の地域合意形成は喫緊の課題であり、GX推進・電力系統政策における住民受容と公正な利益配分設計の示唆として読める。SSBJ開示とは直接関係しないが、トランジション政策の社会受容ガバナンスを考える材料になる。
In the global GX context
Adds empirical evidence to the global transition-finance and just-transition debate: social acceptance and procedural fairness are preconditions for delivering renewable capacity that underpins corporate decarbonization targets and ISSB-aligned transition plans. Relevant to policymakers designing siting and benefit-sharing frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:風力受容における政治志向と信頼・公正認識の交互作用を実証した基準研究として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ調達や地域拠点を持つ企業は、地域住民向けの対面参加と利益配分の透明化を計画に組み込むべき。
🏛政策担当者:立地基準と収益配分を明示・執行可能にし、信頼できる情報仲介と公正な手続き設計を政策に反映すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Public support for wind energy in Germany is high, yet local opposition can impede project delivery. This study examines which socio-demographic characteristics predict acceptance of onshore wind energy and whether effects differ between urban and rural residents in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). We analyze a representative survey of N = 6284 adults fielded in September 2021, using survey weights. We focus on wind-salient outcomes (support for local wind expansion and landscape evaluations) and situate preferences for information, participation, conflict handling, and benefit-sharing as actionable process levers. Analytically, we (i) report weighted mean differences by place; (ii) estimate weighted least-squares models in which place of residence, political orientation, education, and age enter jointly; and (iii) test moderated regressions to assess whether urban-rural context conditions the influence of trust and perceived fairness. Results show that political orientation is by far the strongest correlate of wind-salient attitudes; education and age contribute only weak gradients that are not consistently distinguishable from zero, and the direct urban-rural effect is small and statistically indistinguishable from zero once other markers are held constant. Trust in scientists and planning authorities and perceived procedural/distributive fairness are strongly and positively associated with support; moreover, context matters: in rural settings, higher trust and clearly governed fairness arrangements are especially consequential. We discuss planning implications, focusing on the need to: embed co-designed, face-to-face participation alongside transparent disclosures; route information through credible intermediaries; and make siting criteria and revenue-sharing explicit and enforceable. The study clarifies how classic acceptance drivers interact with place and provides actionable guidance for tailoring engagement to different constituencies in Germany.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115475first seen 2026-10-24 04:38:31 · last seen 2026-11-02 04:35:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。