gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Varieties of Local Implementation for Net Zero in China: Evidence From Three Cities

中国におけるネットゼロの地域実装の多様性：三都市からの証拠 (AI 翻訳)

Ting Guan, Ziwei Gou, Yixian Sun

Environmental Policy and Governance📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-24#政策Origin: CN
DOI: 10.1002/eet.70101
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70101
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、中国の「ダブルカーボン」目標の都市レベルでの実施を、経済・制度条件の異なる三都市（昌吉、湖州、広州）で比較分析。各都市のガバナンスモデルは経済構造、地方政府のコミットメント、非国家主体の影響により形成されることを明らかにし、ポリセントリックな気候ガバナンスへの理論的貢献を果たす。

English

This paper examines local implementation of China's dual carbon goals in three Chinese cities (Changji, Huzhou, Guangzhou), identifying distinct governance models shaped by economic structure, government commitment, and non-state actors. It proposes a political economy framework explaining variation in net-zero implementation, contributing to polycentric climate governance theory.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の地方自治体によるネットゼロ実装の現状を詳細に示しており、日本の地域脱炭素政策（例：地域脱炭素ロードマップ）の設計や、地方政府の役割を考える上で比較参考となる。特に、経済構造や地方政府の意思決定が実装に与える影響は、日本の自治体にも共通する示唆を含む。

In the global GX context

This paper provides rare empirical evidence on subnational net-zero implementation in China, a critical gap in global climate governance literature. The political economy framework offers transferable insights for other countries, especially those with strong central-local dynamics, and contributes to the polycentric governance debate in a non-democratic context.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Useful for scholars studying climate policy implementation, polycentric governance, and subnational decarbonization in authoritarian contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Policymakers in Chinese cities and similar developing regions can learn from the three governance models to design context-appropriate net-zero strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on how local conditions shape net-zero outcomes, informing national policies that support tailored subnational action.

📄 Abstract（原文）

ABSTRACT Since China updated its nationally determined contributions in 2021, achieving carbon peaking before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060—the so‐called “dual carbon” goals—has become the new guiding principle of China's climate governance. However, few studies have examined the implementation of China's dual carbon goals, particularly the variation at the subnational level. To bridge this knowledge gap, we investigate the strategies to implement the dual carbon goals in three Chinese cities with different economic and institutional conditions: Changji, Huzhou, and Guangzhou. Drawing on data from policy documents, media reports, and field interviews, we identify distinctive governance models adopted by the three city governments, shaped by their respective local contexts. Based on our inductive case studies, we propose a political economy framework that highlights three key factors—economic structure, local government commitment and prior experience, and the influence of non‐state actors—to explain variation in net‐zero implementation across Chinese cities. By unpacking the dynamics of local adaptation and innovation in net‐zero governance, our study contributes to the theoretical debate on polycentricity in China's climate governance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。