脱炭素化経路における持続可能性と気候レジリエンスを高めるための循環経済戦略の活用
Leveraging Circular-Economy Strategies to Enhance Sustainability and Climate Resilience for Decarbonization Pathways (原題)
Elena Simina Lakatos, Vladut Vasile Constandoiu, Andreea Loredana Rhazzali, Anamaria Sim, Anca Cristina Glavan, Oana Bianca Panait
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは循環経済（CE）と排出削減・資源効率・気候レジリエンスの関係を、WoS文献の計量書誌分析と72件の精読を通じて整理した。建設・エネルギー・廃棄物管理が主要応用分野で、再利用・リサイクル・産業共生・PaaSが頻出戦略。レジリエンス貢献の証拠は乏しく、排出削減・資源節約・レジリエンス指標を統合する枠組みを提案する。
English
This review examines links between circular economy (CE), emission reduction, resource efficiency, and climate resilience via a bibliometric analysis and 72 reviewed studies. Construction, energy, and waste management dominate; reuse, recycling, industrial symbiosis, and product-as-a-service are common strategies. Evidence on resilience remains thin, so the authors propose an integrated framework combining emission, resource, and resilience indicators.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではサーキュラーエコノミーがGX推進戦略や資源循環政策と連動しつつあるが、本稿は開示枠組み（SSBJ/TCFD）との接続が弱く、企業の統合報告における資源循環KPI設計の参考資料としての位置づけが中心となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, CE is increasingly folded into transition finance and CSRD/ISSB resource-use disclosures, yet resilience metrics remain under-standardized. This paper's integrated indicator framework offers a conceptual bridge for linking circularity targets to climate disclosure and transition-plan credibility.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CEと気候レジリエンス指標の統合枠組みを提案し、今後の実証研究の出発点を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:建設・エネルギー・廃棄物分野で循環戦略と排出削減KPIを結びつける際の整理に使える。
🏛政策担当者:資源循環政策と脱炭素政策の統合評価指標の設計に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change and increasing pressure on natural resources highlight the limitations of the predominantly linear economic model of production and consumption, and the need for more integrated sustainable approaches. Circular economy (CE) strategies offer a potential alternative, contributing to reduction of emissions and resource conservation, while increasing the resilience of systems to climate shocks. This review examines the relationship between CE, emission reduction, resource efficiency, and climate resilience. A bibliometric analysis was first conducted for the initial subset of reviewed articles obtained from the Web of Science (WoS), following particularly predesigned criteria for inclusion and exclusion, to establish the main conceptual and thematic structures in the literature. Across the 72 studies included in the final review, sectors such as construction, energy, and waste management emerged as prominent application fields, with strategies like reuse, recycling, industrial symbiosis, and product as a service among frequently investigated strategies. The contribution of CE to climate resilience in the current review remains limited. Resilience, however, is often harder to measure and less well-documented. To address this gap, an integrated framework is proposed that brings together indicators of emissions reduction, resource saving, and climate resilience, allowing potential synergies and trade-offs among these dimensions. The findings further highlight the need to move from isolated assessment towards a more systematic interconnected assessment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189390first seen 2026-09-16 05:36:36 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:44:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。