Green industrial policy: a critical evaluation of State Aid for renewables
グリーン産業政策：再生可能エネルギーへの国家援助の批判的評価 (AI 翻訳)
Caroline Buts, Seppe Maes, Clara BOTREL LIMA, Songyue Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUにおける再生可能エネルギー支援のための国家援助制度の事後評価を体系的にレビュー。評価の方法論、実施上の課題、成功例と失敗例を整理し、今後のクリーンエネルギー政策の効率化に貢献する知見を提供する。
English
This paper systematically reviews ex-post evaluations of EU State aid schemes for renewable energy. It examines evaluation methodologies, common pitfalls, and best practices, offering insights for designing more effective clean energy policies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも再エネ支援策（FIT/FIP）の効果検証が進む中、EUの制度評価手法は参考になる。特にインセンティブ効果や比例性の分析枠組みは、日本のエネルギー政策評価に応用可能。
In the global GX context
As the EU refines its State aid evaluation for renewables, this paper provides a methodological framework applicable globally. It highlights how to assess incentive effects and proportionality, relevant for any government designing green subsidies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A comprehensive review of evaluation practices for renewable energy subsidies, offering methodological insights for policy evaluation studies.
🏢実務担当者:Governments and agencies can use the best practices and pitfalls identified to improve their own aid scheme evaluations.
🏛政策担当者:Useful for designing and assessing state aid for renewables, emphasizing evidence-based policy cycles.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Evaluating State aid measures is not only good practice contributing to the closed policy cycle, but it has also become a mandatory exercise for large aid schemes following the State Aid Modernisation initiative. Evaluations support some of the key State aid principles: i) verify incentive effect or to what extent the measure realises projects that would not materialise in the absence of the aid, ii) map proportionality or the minimum public funding needed to leverage the level of required private resources, and iii) analyse the appropriateness of the measure to achieve the policy objectives in the least distortive way. This Article reviews the ex-post evaluations of large schemes for renewables that have been carried out and are kept in the systematic catalogue of the Commissionʼs Competence Centre on Microeconomic Evaluation. After detailing the case selection process, a descriptive analysis outlines the renewables aid schemes that have been evaluated per energy type, duration and evaluation methods. In addition, we present a timeline with the diverse evaluation steps and point to common pitfalls. Finally, we review the results of the evaluations and present the main takeaways and challenges for aid schemes supporting the transition to renewable energy. By systematically reviewing these ex-post evaluations, we aspire to present a comprehensive list of good practices as well as actions to avoid and as such to contribute to more efficient ʼcleanʼ policies in support of the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2026(165)05first seen 2026-05-15 20:14:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。