Quantum Intelligence (QI)-Driven Cross-Level Environmental Monitoring and Governance: Case Studies of Semiconductor Process Emissions, Industrial Wastewater, Urban PM2.5, and Carbon Inventory in Energy Management
量子インテリジェンス(QI)駆動のクロスレベル環境モニタリングとガバナンス:半導体プロセス排出、産業廃水、都市PM2.5、エネルギー管理における炭素インベントリのケーススタディ (AI 翻訳)
Ke W
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、環境モニタリングをESG・ネットゼロ政策下の協働ガバナンス基盤と捉え、量子最適化と量子機械学習を組み合わせた「量子インテリジェンス(QI)」が、データから意思決定、継続的改善に至る閉ループを再形成する可能性を探る。半導体排出、産業廃水、都市PM2.5、炭素インベントリの4事例を通じ、QIがガバナンスサイクル短縮や部門間連携向上に寄与することを示す。
English
This paper frames environmental monitoring as collaborative governance infrastructure under ESG and net-zero policies, and explores how 'Quantum Intelligence (QI)'—combining quantum optimization and quantum machine learning—can reshape the closed-loop from data to decision-making to continuous improvement. Through four case studies (semiconductor emissions, industrial wastewater, urban PM2.5, carbon inventory), it argues QI's value lies in shortening governance cycles and improving cross-sector collaboration and auditability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示や有報での非財務情報拡充が進み、環境データのガバナンスと監査可能性が重要課題。本論文のQIによる監査可能なガバナンスループは、日本企業の開示対応や投資家向け情報の信頼性向上に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, with ISSB and CSRD mandating robust sustainability disclosures, the need for auditable and traceable environmental data is paramount. This paper's framework for integrating advanced AI (QI) into environmental governance offers a novel approach to enhancing data credibility and cross-organizational collaboration, relevant for multinational corporations and regulators.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework linking quantum intelligence to environmental governance, offering a new lens for AI-ESG research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers implementation paths and governance mechanisms for integrating advanced analytics into environmental monitoring and disclosure processes.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the potential of quantum intelligence in enhancing regulatory oversight and data auditability, informing future policy on AI in environmental governance.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Environmental monitoring, driven by ESGs and net-zero policies and increasingly stringent regulations, has transformed from compliance-oriented data collection into a critical infrastructure for cross-departmental and cross-organizational (enterprise–government–supply chain) collaborative governance. However, while traditional artificial intelligence (AI) can support pollution prediction and anomaly detection, it often faces challenges such as processing delays in high-dimensional streaming data, optimization difficulties in multiobjective and multiconstraint governance scenarios, and difficulty in institutionalizing “pattern output” into an “auditable, traceable, and executable” governance loop. In this paper, "QI (quantum intelligence)" is used as a hybrid intelligent decision-making capability that combines quantum optimization and quantum machine learning (QML). From the perspectives of management strategies and governance systems, it explores how QI can reshape the closed-loop process of environmental monitoring from data to decision-making to continuous improvement. This study employs a qualitative multicase study method, focusing on four highly representative scenarios—semiconductor process emissions, industrial wastewater, urban PM2.5, and carbon inventory-energy management—and incorporates relationships between enterprises, government environmental protection agencies, and the supply chain. This paper defines quality intake (QI) from a resource-based value (RBV) perspective as a valuable, scarce, and difficult-to-imitate strategic resource portfolio. It explains how QI enhances sensing, seizing, and transforming using dynamic capability theory. Furthermore, it translates the technical capabilities of QI into implementable process governance, accountability matrices, and auditing mechanisms using PDCA/TQM. The results suggest a “QI-driven cross-level environmental monitoring governance pattern,” indicating that the management value of QI lies not in single-point computing power but in shortening governance cycles, expanding the set of solvable problems, and improving cross-sector collaboration and decision-making auditability. This paper further proposes implementation paths, governance risks (pattern risks, data governance, accountability and disclosure), and key investment assessment points, providing strategic references for enterprises and governments in the platformization and intelligent transformation of environmental governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Research Square https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202608.0307.v1first seen 2026-08-08 04:32:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。