From Compliance to Execution: Mandatory ESG Disclosure and Corporate Decarbonization—Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences Analysis (EU vs. Japan)

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:This paper offers robust causal evidence on the effectiveness of mandatory disclosure in reducing emissions, with implications for disclosure regulation design.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams should note that mandatory disclosure can lead to real emission reductions, especially when supported by CSR committees.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can use this evidence to justify stronger mandatory disclosure requirements and consider governance mechanisms like CSR committees.

The global regulatory landscape is shifting from voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting to mandatory Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure, yet whether this transition drives substantive corporate environmental change or merely symbolic compliance remains empirically contested. This study investigates the causal impact of mandatory ESG disclosure on firm value and operational carbon intensity, drawing on an unbalanced panel of 9682 firm-year observations for 1626 listed firms from the European Union (EU-27) and Japan covering the period 2018 to 2024. The EU serves as the treatment group, where mandatory disclosure requirements escalated substantially from 2021 onward through the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive proposal. Japan serves as the control group, representing a developed economy with sophisticated capital markets and high ESG awareness that maintained a voluntary disclosure environment throughout the study period. A Difference-in-Differences framework with firm- and year-fixed effects is employed, and causal identification is validated through a dynamic event study analysis. Three principal findings emerge. First, mandatory ESG disclosure is not associated with a statistically significant improvement in firm value in the EU–Japan comparative context, a result that is interpreted as descriptive rather than causal given evidence of pre-existing valuation divergence between the two groups. Second, mandatory disclosure is associated with a significant and progressive reduction in Scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity, indicating substantive operational decarbonization rather than symbolic compliance. Third, this emissions-reducing effect is significantly amplified among firms with dedicated CSR sustainability committees, while the board independence policy indicator yields no significant moderating effect, a finding attributed to data limitations. These results carry direct implications for policymakers designing climate-related disclosure frameworks and for scholars examining the boundary conditions under which mandatory transparency translates into genuine environmental performance.

• crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126040first seen 2026-06-13 04:48:08