AI-Driven Compensation Transparency and Human Capital Accounting Disclosure: A Framework for Manufacturing Organizations in Emerging Economies
AI主導の報酬透明性と人的資本会計開示:新興経済国の製造業組織のためのフレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Dr. Thanakit Ouanhlee
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、タイの製造業組織を対象に、AI統合型報酬システムと人的資本会計開示(HCAD)の質との関係を調査し、AI-HCAD実施フレームワークを開発・検証した。AI統合は中程度である一方、開示品質は低く、組織の透明性文化が重要な調整要因であることを示した。
English
This study examines the relationship between AI integration in compensation systems and human capital accounting disclosure (HCAD) quality among manufacturing organizations in Thailand. It finds that while AI integration is moderate, disclosure quality remains low, and organizational transparency culture (pay transparency) significantly moderates the relationship, leading to a proposed AI-HCAD implementation framework.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では人的資本開示が注目されているが、本論文はタイの製造業を対象としており、日本企業のASEAN進出時の開示実務に示唆を与える。また、AI導入と開示文化の両立の重要性を強調しており、日本企業のESG開示戦略にも参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global ESG disclosure scholarship by empirically demonstrating that AI capability alone does not ensure high-quality human capital disclosure; institutional readiness, such as pay transparency, is the enabling mechanism. The findings are relevant for emerging economies and multinational corporations operating in such contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Advance understanding of the conditions under which AI improves human capital disclosure in emerging economies.
🏢実務担当者:Invest in both AI systems and a transparency culture to effectively disclose human capital data and meet stakeholder expectations.
🏛政策担当者:Develop regulatory guidance and technical assistance frameworks to help manufacturing organizations bridge the gap between AI capability and disclosure quality.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between AI integration in compensation systems and the quality of human capital accounting disclosure (HCAD) among manufacturing organizations in Thailand's Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), and developed and validated an integrated framework that links AI-driven compensation analytics to human capital disclosure practices. Design/Methodology/Approach: A cross-sectional, exploratory sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative survey data from 400 manufacturing organizations across Chonburi, Rayong, and Chachoengsao with qualitative thematic analysis of three open-ended questions embedded in the same survey instrument. Quantitative analysis used correlation analysis, Cronbach's alpha reliability testing, and subgroup moderation testing through Fisher's z-test. Qualitative analysis followed Braun and Clarke's (2021) six-phase thematic method, with quantitative and qualitative findings integrated through a joint display (Fetters et al., 2013). Confirmatory factor analysis, bootstrapped mediation testing, and inferential moderated regression are committed to the next research phase. Findings: AI integration in compensation systems demonstrated moderate-to-high levels (M = 4.73), while human capital disclosure quality remained persistently low (M = 2.98), producing a data-to-disclosure gap of 1.75 points. The direct relationship between AI integration and HCAD quality was not supported (H1: r = −0.075, p = .132), nor was mediation by integration protocols (H2) or moderation by organizational size (H4). Pay transparency was confirmed as a significant positive moderator (H3: z = 2.25, p = .024), demonstrating that organizational transparency culture — rather than technological capability alone — conditions disclosure outcomes. Qualitative themes (organizational readiness, governance, ethical legitimacy) provided convergent evidence from an independent methodological lens. A tiered AI–Human Capital Accounting Disclosure (AI-HCAD) implementation framework was developed and validated across organizational segments. Barrier–enabler analysis revealed that technical constraints (M = 3.67) and weak external support structures (M = 2.45) sustain the gap between AI capability and disclosure practice. Practical Implications: Manufacturing organizations must invest simultaneously in AI infrastructure and in an internal transparency culture to translate data capabilities into stakeholder-accessible disclosures. Policymakers and industry bodies should strengthen external enablers through regulatory guidance and technical assistance frameworks. Originality/Value: This study provides the first empirically grounded framework that integrates AI-driven compensation systems with human capital accounting disclosure in emerging-economy manufacturing. The findings reframe AI integration as a necessary but not sufficient condition for disclosure quality — institutional readiness, embodied in pay transparency, is the enabling mechanism that translates technological capability into stakeholder-accessible reporting. By demonstrating that institutional readiness, not technological capacity, conditions disclosure outcomes, the study advances theory across AI transparency, human capital accounting, and organizational disclosure behavior.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2026.110400178first seen 2026-07-18 08:35:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。