再エネ導入からSDGs成果へ:相乗効果とトレードオフに関する地球規模・ライフサイクル・エビデンス感応型の統合的枠組み
From Renewable-Energy Deployment to SDG Outcomes: A Global, Life-Cycle- and Evidence-Sensitive Integrative Framework of Synergies and Trade-Offs (原題)
Nasir Abbas, Farooq Ahmad, A. Akram, Muhammad Adnan Afzal
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
再エネがSDGs全体に与える影響を、ライフサイクル・技術別効果・エネルギーアクセス・環境正義・インパクト評価の統合により整理した概念的枠組みを提示。文脈とガバナンスが導入属性やライフサイクル活動を介してSDG成果と分配に至る経路を示し、5段階のエビデンス階梯を導入する。サービス品質や技術・サプライチェーン選択、参加と分配が誰が便益と費用を負うかを左右すると結論。6つの検証可能命題と指標案を提示する。
English
This conceptual synthesis builds an integrative framework linking renewable-energy deployment to SDG outcomes via context, governance, life-cycle activities, and distributional effects. It introduces a five-level evidence ladder separating stated alignment from attributable impacts, and argues that service quality, technology and supply-chain choices, and participation shape who benefits and who bears costs. Six testable propositions and an indicator scheme are proposed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
再エネ調達やScope3削減を進める日本企業が、脱炭素の『便益と費用の分配』を統合報告書やSSBJ開示でどう説明するかに示唆を与える。SDGs貢献の主張に対するエビデンス水準の峻別は、グリーンウォッシュ回避の観点で実務的価値がある。
In the global GX context
Offers global disclosure scholarship a structured way to distinguish claimed SDG alignment from attributable impact, relevant to CSRD/ISSB co-benefit and impact-materiality narratives. Its evidence ladder helps counter greenwashing in sustainability reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:再エネとSDGsの因果経路をエビデンス階梯で整理する分析枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ導入のSDGs貢献主張を、検証可能な指標とエビデンス水準で整理する際に使える。
🏛政策担当者:再エネ政策の分配効果とトレードオフを評価する際の枠組みとして活用できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Renewable energy is central to climate mitigation and to SDG 7, yet its wider contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is not automatic. Existing studies identify potential synergies with health, employment, infrastructure, poverty reduction, and climate action, alongside trade-offs involving land, water, food systems, biodiversity, materials, waste, and the distribution of costs and benefits. Because recent global syntheses have already mapped renewable-energy contributions across all 17 SDGs, a further general mapping would offer limited novelty. This paper therefore develops a complementary conceptual framework through an integrative synthesis of research on SDG interactions, renewable-energy life cycles, technology-specific effects, energy access, environmental justice, and impact evaluation. The framework links context and governance to deployment attributes, life-cycle activities, mediating mechanisms, target-level SDG outcomes, distributional outcomes, and feedback over time, and it introduces a five-level evidence ladder that distinguishes stated alignment and potential interactions from outputs, observed outcomes, and attributable impacts. The synthesis indicates that service quality and actual use condition the development effects of access, that technology and supply-chain choices shape environmental burdens, and that participation and distributional arrangements determine who benefits and who bears costs. Six testable propositions, an operational indicator scheme, and a research agenda are proposed. The paper is a transparent conceptual synthesis based on a discovery-led literature search rather than an exhaustive systematic review, and it does not claim that any single renewable technology uniformly advances the SDGs. References Adnan Afzal, M., Rahman, S. U., Kamran, H. W., Iqbal, Y., & Rasheed, M. (2026). Driving green factor productivity in OECD economies: The effect of fintech, sectoral foreign investment, environmental funding and regulatory power. Kybernetes, 55(9), 4273–4298. Ahlbäck, A., Klingvall, H., Nordell, E., & Eriksson, K. (2026). Impacts of key technologies on the Sustainable Development Goals to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions in Sweden. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00558-4 Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S. P., & Urpelainen, J. (2017). Does basic energy access generate socioeconomic benefits? A field experiment with off-grid solar power in India. Science Advances, 3(5), Article e1602153. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602153 Almulhim, A. I., & Abubakar, I. R. (2026). The role of renewable energy in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116679 Batra, B., Standal, K., Aamodt, S., Sarangi, G. K., & Shrivastava, M. K. (2025). Integrating energy justice and SDGs in solar energy transition: Analysis of the state solar policies of India. Energies, 18(15), Article 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153952 Fuso Nerini, F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M., Borrion, A., Spataru, C., Castán Broto, V., Anandarajah, G., Milligan, B., & Mulugetta, Y. (2017). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 Gupta, E. (2019). The impact of solar water pumps on energy-water-food nexus: Evidence from Rajasthan, India. Energy Policy, 129, 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.008 Hernandez, R. R., Jordaan, S. M., Kaldunski, B., & Kumar, N. (2020). Aligning climate change and Sustainable Development Goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Frontiers in Sustainability, 1, Article 583090. https://doi.org/10.3389/frssu.2020.583090 Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Weindl, I., Biewald, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Dietrich, J. P., Klein, D., Kreidenweis, U., Müller, C., Rolinski, S., & Stevanović, M. (2018). Large-scale bioenergy production: How to resolve sustainability trade-offs? Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), Article 024011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b Iacobuta, G. I., Höhne, N., van Soest, H. L., & Leemans, R. (2021). Transitioning to low-carbon economies under the 2030 Agenda: Minimizing trade-offs and enhancing co-benefits of climate-change action for the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910774 International Energy Agency, International Renewable Energy Agency, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, & World Health Organization. (2025). Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2025. World Bank. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2025/Jun/Tracking-SDG-7-The-Energy-Progress-Report-2025 International Renewable Energy Agency. (2025). Renewable capacity statistics 2025. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Mar/IRENA_DAT_RE_Capacity_Statistics_2025.pdf Kamran, H. W., & Afzal, M. A. (2025). Sustainability blueprint: The role of green energy quality, energy patents, and investment among the selected OECD economies. Sustainable Futures, 10, Article 100942. Klemm, M. M., Ojanperä, S., & Schweikert, A. (2022). Toward evaluating the effect of technology choices on linkages between Sustainable Development Goals. iScience, 26(1), Article 105727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105727 Klemm, M. M., Ojanperä, S., & Schweikert, A. (2024). Approach for characterizing technology- and infrastructure-induced linkages between Sustainable Development Goals. STAR Protocols, 5(1), Article 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102639 Levenda, A. M., Behrsin, I., & Disano, F. (2021). Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, Article 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101837 Long, L. A. N., Lee, D., Kim, R. E., van Laerhoven, F., Viña, A. L. L., Delgado, A. N., & Buchori, D. (2026). Indigenous peoples and renewable energy: Impacts, contestations, and collective action. Environmental Research Letters, 21. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae5674 Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Arvesen, A., Gibon, T., Bodirsky, B. L., de Boer, H. S., Fricko, O., Hejazi, M., Humpenöder, F., Iyer, G., Mima, S., Mouratiadou, I., Pietzcker, R. C., Popp, A., van den Berg, M., van Vuuren, D., & Hertwich, E. G. (2019). Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nature Communications, 10, Article 5229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8 Makešová, M., & Valentová, M. (2021). The concept of multiple impacts of renewable energy sources: A critical review. Energies, 14(11), Article 3183. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113183 McCollum, D. L., Echeverri, L. G., Busch, S., Pachauri, S., Parkinson, S., Rogelj, J., Krey, V., Minx, J. C., Nilsson, M., Stevance, A.-S., & Riahi, K. (2018). Connecting the Sustainable Development Goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), Article 033006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3 Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., Neumann, B., Stevance, A.-S., Visbeck, M., & Stafford-Smith, M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1489–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z Robledo-Abad, C., Althaus, H.-J., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Corbera, E., Creutzig, F., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Geddes, A., Gregg, J. S., Haberl, H., Hanger, S., Harper, R. J., Hunsberger, C., Larsen, R. K., Lauk, C., Leitner, S., Lilliestam, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Muys, B., ... Smith, P. (2017). Bioenergy production and sustainable development: Science base for policymaking remains limited. GCB Bioenergy, 9(3), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12338 Silva, P., Damásio, B., Fortes, P., Soares, I., & Amaral, R. (2026). Are renewable energy sources advancing towards a sustainable society? Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-07221-0 Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 Sovacool, B. K. (2021). Who are the victims of low-carbon transitions? Towards a political ecology of climate change mitigation. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, Article 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 Tian, J., Culley, S. A., Maier, H. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2024). Is renewable energy sustainable? Potential relationships between renewable energy production and the Sustainable Development Goals. npj Climate Action, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00120-6 Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283 Walston, L. J., Barley, T., Bhandari, I., Campbell, B., McCall, J., Hartmann, H. M., & Dolezal, A. G. (2022). Opportunities for agricultural systems to achieve synergistic food-energy-environmental needs and address sustainability goals. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, Article 932018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.932018 Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x Yavuz, C., Ravat, Z., León, M. D. A., Lee, S., Fernandes, P., Reifmesser, Q., Gaved, F., Pilato, S., Parrao, C. G., & Snilstveit, B. (2025). Improving energy access, climate and socioeconomic outcomes through off-grid electrification technologies: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70060 Zandi, G., Abbas, N., Shahid, M. S., & Shahzad, I.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i11.272first seen 2026-11-12 05:34:51 · last seen 2026-11-13 05:43:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。