Comparison of the Performance of Pasture-Fed and Indoor-Fed Ruminants: A Literature Dataset on Weight Gain and Carcass Characteristics
放牧飼育と屋内飼育の反芻動物の性能比較：体重増加と枝肉特性に関する文献データセット (AI 翻訳)
Boval Maryline, Shaqura Imad, Berthelot Valérie
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本データセットは、40年間にわたる比較試験に基づき、放牧飼育と屋内飼育の反芻動物のパフォーマンス（体重増加、枝肉特性）を比較した2014年のメタ分析の基礎データです。放牧システムはメタン排出を土壌炭素隔離で相殺し、生物多様性保全や火災リスク低減など環境的便益を持ちます。このデータの再利用により、持続可能な畜産の評価が促進されます。
English
This dataset underpins a 2014 meta-analysis comparing weight gain and carcass characteristics of ruminants in pasture-fed vs. indoor-fed systems over 40 years. The analysis found that pasture performance was equivalent to indoor, despite supplementation for indoor systems. Grazing systems provide environmental co-benefits such as soil carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and fire risk reduction. The dataset is provided to encourage reuse and further evaluation of grass-based livestock systems in sustainability debates.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の畜産業では、温室効果ガス削減と持続可能性が課題です。本データセットは放牧システムの環境便益と生産性を評価する基盤を提供し、日本での草地活用や耕畜連携の議論に貢献し得ます。
In the global GX context
This dataset contributes to global debates on sustainable livestock systems, aligning with climate change mitigation (soil carbon sequestration) and biodiversity goals. It provides empirical evidence that pasture systems can match indoor productivity while offering environmental co-benefits, relevant for TCFD/ISSB disclosures on land use and agriculture.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This dataset supports meta-analyses comparing productivity and environmental impacts of grazing vs. indoor systems, useful for sustainable agriculture research.
🏢実務担当者:Livestock farmers and land managers can use these findings to justify pasture-based systems as productive and environmentally beneficial.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can reference this data to design incentives for grazing systems that align with climate and biodiversity targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Grazing systems, commonly considered less productive than indoor livestock farming, account for most farms and agricultural land worldwide. Beyond feeding livestock, they fulfil essential environmental, economic, and social functions that are particularly relevant to sustainable development in the context of climate change, resource constraints, and population growth. By relying on circular resource use and promoting ecological processes, grazing systems can offset methane emissions from livestock through soil carbon sequestration while preserving biodiversity, maintaining landscapes, and reducing fire risks. In order to assess whether grazing systems are actually less productive than indoor systems, data from comparative trials assessing these two feeding environments published over 40 years were used as the basis for a meta-analysis published in 2014. This analysis showed that animal performance on pasture was equivalent to that indoors, despite the supplementation provided primarily to indoor feeding environments. Given the economic and environmental context and the challenges related to the sustainable development of livestock farming, here, we present this 2014 data to encourage its equitable reuse and contribute to a better overall assessment of grazing in current debates, considering all aspects, including animal performance. Furthermore, supplementing this initial dataset with additional data will lead to an even more comprehensive evaluation of these grass-based livestock systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/data11070170first seen 2026-07-13 07:29:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。