Failure of CCS and Energy Transition and the Disastrous Effect on Oil Production
CCSとエネルギー転換の失敗と石油生産への壊滅的影響 (AI 翻訳)
S. M. F. Ali, Qiuye Song, J. Jones
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、CCS/CCUSとエネルギー転換が過去20年間で期待された成果を上げていないと批判し、その技術的・経済的理由を分析する。排出量のスコープ分類の問題を指摘し、石油・ガスの完全廃止やCO2の化学的固定の必要性を提唱している。
English
This paper critically examines the failure of CCS/CCUS and energy transition to meet expectations over the past two decades, discussing technical and financial reasons. It highlights issues with Scope 1-2-3 classification for emissions and advocates for phasing out oil and gas or chemically fixing CO2 at the point of emission.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではCCSやCCUSがカーボンニュートラル戦略の一部とされているが、本論文はその有効性に疑問を投げかけている。日本のGX政策においてCCSへの過度な依存を見直す材料となる可能性があるが、主張の根拠が限定的である点に注意が必要。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a skeptical perspective on CCS/CCUS and energy transition, relevant to global debates on net-zero pathways. It raises questions about the reliance on CCS in corporate climate strategies and the role of Scope 3 accounting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a critical perspective on CCS/CCUS effectiveness and energy transition progress, useful for those researching decarbonization pathways.
🏢実務担当者:Challenges assumptions about CCS viability; may inform corporate climate strategy reassessment.
🏛政策担当者:Raises concerns about prioritizing CCS and energy transition policies; suggests considering alternative approaches.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Energy Transition are needed to achieve Net Zero by 2050, but for the past two decades CCS accounts for only 0.1% of some 40 billion tonnes of CO2 emitted globally and Energy Transition through renewables is a small fraction of the total energy production. Reasons for that are discussed, alternatives are suggested, and the disastrous effects on oil and gas production are examined. The projects for CCS and CCUS are briefly described and the lack of success for both technological and financial reasons is discussed. The problems introduced by assigning Scopes 1, 2, and 3 to emissions are underlined. Cost of CO2 captured by different methods is compared showing that Direct Air Capture, being employed industrially, is the most expensive. Reasons for pursuing that are mentioned. A careful survey of CCS/CCUS and Energy Transition shows that project success depends strongly on the presence of incentives in various forms, over the long term. Given that CCS/CCUS and Energy Transition have failed to live up to expectations, the remedies are: 1. to phase out oil and gas completely, consequences of which are discussed; and 2. to devise ways to "fix" the CO2 chemically or utilize it completely as it is emitted.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.2118/232858-msfirst seen 2026-05-15 20:49:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。