← 論文一覧に戻る

NARRATIVES OF CLIMATE GOVERNANCE TRANSITION IN TÜRKİYE: A CASE STUDY ON TÜRKİYE’S CLIMATE LAW

トルコの気候ガバナンス移行のナラティブ：トルコ気候法に関するケーススタディ (AI 翻訳)

İsa Yusuf Ağaç, İzzet Arı

Ombudsman Akademik📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-16#政策経営インパクト: 調達リスク
DOI: 10.32002/ombudsmanakademik.1912979
原典: https://doi.org/10.32002/ombudsmanakademik.1912979

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、トルコ気候法（第7552号）を批判的政治経済学の視点から分析。議会環境委員会の議事録を検討し、政府と企業団体はEUのCBAM対策として法を位置づける一方、野党と市民社会は資本寄りの偏りを批判する。発見は、法が輸出志向資本の国際市場アクセス維持の戦略的手段であり、気候政策をトップダウン化することを示す。

English

This paper analyzes Türkiye's Climate Law through a critical political economy lens, examining parliamentary committee proceedings. It finds that the government and business frame the law as a safeguard against the EU's CBAM, while opposition and civil society criticize its pro-capital bias and neglect of social costs. The law primarily serves to maintain international market access for export-oriented capital, reinforcing a centralized, state-capital alliance rather than inclusive governance.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策においても、CBAMや炭素価格の設計が議論されている。本論文はトルコの事例から、気候法が貿易競争力確保の手段に矮小化されるリスクを示し、日本の気候政策策定における制度的包摂の重要性を示唆する。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global debate on climate governance and carbon border adjustment, highlighting how domestic climate laws may be driven by international trade pressures rather than ecological urgency. It offers a critical perspective on market-based decarbonization and centralization, relevant for countries designing CBAM and emissions trading schemes.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a political economy framework for analyzing climate legislation, useful for scholars studying carbon markets, CBAM, and climate governance.

🏛政策担当者:Warns against designing climate law primarily as a trade instrument, urging inclusive and participatory processes to address social costs of transition.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The adoption of Climate Law (No. 7552) marks an important milestone in Türkiye’s climate governance. Yet, many critics view the legislation as a product of economic pragmatism rather than ecological urgency. By analyzing the Turkish Parliament’s Environment Committee proceedings through a critical political economy lens, this research aims to uncover the perceptions of the key stakeholders on Türkiye’s climate policies and their underlying interests that influence the architecture of this legislation. While the government and business associations frame the Law as a vital safeguard against the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, the opposition members and civil society point to a “pro-capital” bias that ignores the social costs of transition and inherent risks of market-based decarbonization. The findings suggest that the Law primarily functions as a strategic tool designed to maintain international market access for export-oriented capital fractions. Moreover, the Law’s centralized governance structure reinforces strategic state-capital alliance in Türkiye, which reduces climate policy as a top-down bureaucratic initiative rather than an inclusive, participatory process.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。