インドネシアにおける海洋空間利用規制、ブルーカーボン、海洋安全保障：スコーピングレビュー

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Implementation-gap framing and the mangrove/seagrass evidence asymmetry are useful entry points for empirical work on spatial-plan enforcement.

🏢実務担当者:Signals that blue-carbon and coastal nature-based projects in Indonesia face enforcement and monitoring risk that should inform due diligence.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for conformity assessment, monitoring, and enforcement capacity in marine spatial planning, especially for seagrasses and eastern Indonesia.

Blue carbon ecosystems are increasingly central to climate mitigation, coastal resilience, and maritime governance, but their protection in Indonesia depends on how spatial plans are translated into effective implementation and control. This scoping review maps the relationship between marine spatial use control and mangrove and seagrass protection in Indonesia and interprets the implications for maritime security. Guided by JBI methodology and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, searches of Scopus, Web of Science, GARUDA, and DOAJ, complemented by citation searching, yielded a final corpus of 39 studies. The evidence base is strongly asymmetrical: 29 studies focused on mangroves, whereas only three focused specifically on seagrasses; conclusions concerning seagrass governance are therefore exploratory and should not be generalized from the mangrove-dominated corpus. Regional Spatial Plans (RTRW) were the most frequently examined instrument type (12 studies), followed by coastal and small-island zoning plans (RZWP3K) and functional zoning (five each). The most commonly mapped primary evidence gaps concerned policy and governance (15 studies) and implementation and enforcement (12 studies). Only eight studies applied an explicit blue carbon framing. No formal critical appraisal of individual sources was undertaken, so these frequencies are interpreted as patterns in the reviewed literature rather than as estimates of national policy performance or causal effectiveness. Post-extraction interpretation using Bueger's maritime security framework indicated that the reviewed literature is most readily connected to the marine environment, human security, and economic development; except where security was explicitly discussed by source authors, these categories represent reviewer-applied interpretive pathways rather than direct security effects. Overall, the literature most consistently points to an implementation gap between spatial-plan design and effective control, including spatial conformity assessment, monitoring, institutional coordination, follow-up, and enforcement. Strengthening empirical evaluation of these functions, particularly for seagrasses and eastern Indonesia, is necessary before broader conclusions about blue carbon governance and maritime-security outcomes can be sustained.

• openalex https://doaj.org/article/decf29285cf64138bf83207b6f17940ffirst seen 2026-11-14 05:09:01