The knowledge architecture of carbon markets: A 30-year global view
炭素市場の知識体系：30年間の世界全体の視点 (AI 翻訳)
Carlos Macías, Karime Montes-Escobar, Ezequiel Zamora-Ledezma, Carolina Fonseca-Restrepo, Javier de la Hoz-M
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1994年から2024年の炭素市場に関する国際文献10,552件を計量書誌学的に分析。パリ協定後に研究が急増し、テーマが森林炭素から市場設計や技術革新へ移行。ネットワーク分析で国際協力と中国の国内研究の分断を可視化。政策と技術の学際的分断を指摘し、今後の研究展望を提示。
English
This bibliometric analysis of 10,552 articles on carbon markets from 1994-2024 reveals exponential growth post-Paris Agreement, a thematic shift from forest carbon to market design and technological innovation, and a disciplinary divide between policy and technology journals. It provides a structural mapping of the field and identifies future research directions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のカーボンプライシング政策（GXリーグ、排出量取引制度）の国際的な位置づけを把握するための基礎資料。テーマの遷移は日本が注力すべき研究領域を示唆する。
In the global GX context
This global mapping of carbon market scholarship is highly relevant for aligning national carbon pricing policies with international best practices. It highlights fragmentation between policy and technology research, urging interdisciplinary approaches for effective market design.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies foundational works, emerging themes, and disciplinary divides in carbon market research over 30 years.
🏢実務担当者:Provides a landscape view of carbon market mechanisms and their evolution, useful for strategy formulation.
🏛政策担当者:Shows how research has shifted from conceptual to applied domains, pointing to gaps in policy integration with technology.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric and topic modeling analysis of the global scientific literature on carbon markets from 1994 to 2024. Analyzing 10,552 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Web of Science, the research examines publication trends, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution via Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and HJ-Biplot methodologies. Findings reveal an exponential increase in scholarly output post-Paris Agreement, with China, the United States, and European nations as primary contributors. Thematically, research has transitioned from foundational forest carbon and international frameworks to applied domains, specifically market design, emissions trading systems, and technological innovation. Emerging topics emphasize regional markets, predictive modeling, and green technology investments, whereas voluntary offsets and forest carbon estimation are declining. Network analysis delineates distinct global clusters: Western nations prioritize international cooperation, while China dominates domestic scientific output. The HJ-Biplot visualization exposes a structural disciplinary divide between policy-focused journals and those oriented towards technological and biophysical dimensions, providing empirical evidence of fragmentation in the scholarly landscape. Based on these structural patterns, the study delineates prospective research directions for integrating carbon markets with broader climate policy and innovation agendas, highlighting the critical need for cross-disciplinary approaches. Despite limitations inherent to specific databases, this methodological mapping advances understanding of how knowledge about carbon market evolves within global climate mitigation efforts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102827first seen 2026-05-29 04:47:22 · last seen 2026-06-03 04:43:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。