System Dynamics Model for Decarbonization Pathways in the Global Cement Industry
世界のセメント産業における脱炭素経路のシステムダイナミクスモデル (AI 翻訳)
Oluwafemi Ezekiel Ige, Musasa Kabeya
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は世界のセメント産業のCO2排出削減経路をシステムダイナミクスモデルで分析。5つのシナリオ(BAU、効率化、材料効率、CCS、統合NZ)を評価し、統合NZシナリオのみが2050年に87.9%削減を達成。CCS普及とクリンカ比率が最重要変数と特定。
English
This study develops a system dynamics model for the global cement industry, evaluating five scenarios to 2050. Only the integrated net-zero pathway achieves an 87.9% emission reduction. CCS penetration and clinker-to-cement ratio are identified as key leverage points.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はセメント大手(太平洋セメントなど)がCCSや代替燃料に積極的。本モデルは日本のセメント業界の脱炭素計画(NZEロードマップ)のベンチマークとして有用。SSBJ/有報におけるScope1排出削減目標策定にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
The global cement industry is a major hard-to-abate sector under ISSB and transition finance frameworks. This model provides a reproducible framework for evaluating decarbonization levers, relevant for corporate climate disclosures (TCFD, CSRD) and policy design (e.g., EU CBAM).
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a validated system dynamics model and scenario analysis for cement decarbonization, useful for methodology comparison and parametric uncertainty assessment.
🏢実務担当者:Cement companies can benchmark their decarbonization strategies against the integrated NZE pathway and identify key levers (clinker substitution, CCS).
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates that delayed mitigation leads to cumulative carbon lock-in, supporting early and coordinated policy across efficiency, materials, and CCS.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Cement production remains one of the largest industrial sources of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) because of process emissions from limestone calcination and high-temperature fuel combustion. The primary objective of this study is to quantify the comparative effects of isolated and integrated mitigation portfolios on annual and cumulative global cement emissions through 2050 and to identify the principal leverage points needed for deep sectoral decarbonization. To achieve this, a global aggregate system dynamics model was developed and anchored to a 1990–2022 historical production baseline. The model evaluates five internally consistent scenarios: business-as-usual (BAU), efficiency and alternative fuels (EFF), materials efficiency and clinker substitution (MAT), carbon capture and storage (CCS), and an integrated net-zero-emission (NZE) pathway. The results show that while efficiency improvement alone (EFF) reduces 2050 annual emissions by 14.0% relative to BAU, it does not reverse sector-wide emissions growth. Deep decarbonization requires both substantial clinker-demand reduction (MAT, 33.2%) and broad CCS deployment (CCS, 61.1%). Only the integrated NZE pathway achieves an 87.9% reduction, lowering 2050 direct emissions to 325.8 Mt CO2. Cumulative emissions analysis further shows that delayed structural mitigation results in a large long-term carbon burden, with BAU accumulating 72.86 Gt CO2 over 2023–2050 compared with 40.07 Gt CO2 in the NZE case. A 5000-run Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis confirms that the scenario ranking remains robust under bounded-parameter variation and identifies CCS penetration and the clinker-to-cement ratio as the most influential determinants of long-term mitigation performance. Overall, the study provides a reproducible and policy-relevant framework showing that cement decarbonization cannot rely on single-technology measures, but instead requires coordinated early action across materials efficiency, alternative fuels, and large-scale carbon capture.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8040110first seen 2026-07-17 06:11:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。