南アフリカの積極的土地取得戦略（PLAS）農場における「公正なエネルギー」転換の可能性
Potential for ‘Just-Energy’ Transition in Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy (PLAS) Farms, South Africa (原題)
Sukoluhle Mazwane, L. Ngobeni, Siphe Zantsi, Atie H. Verschoor, P. Chaminuka, Mmapatla Precious Senyolo, Moraka N. Makhura
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
南アフリカ全国1956のPLAS農場を対象に、エネルギー転換の可能性と関連要因を分析した研究。58%がEskomの系統電力に依存する一方、太陽光は13%、風力は0.3%にとどまり、無電化農家は26%に上る。性別・農場規模・教育水準・補助金受給・Eskom供給の有無が太陽光利用に有意に関連し、再エネ補助金や農村インフラ整備、公正移行政策の標的化が必要と結論づける。
English
Surveying 1,956 Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy farms across South Africa, this study assesses potential for a just energy transition. About 58% rely on Eskom grid electricity, only 13% use solar and 0.3% wind, while 26% have no electricity at all. Logistic regression shows gender, farm size, education, recap funding and Eskom supply significantly shape solar uptake, pointing to targeted subsidies, clearer incentives and rural energy infrastructure needs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本とは制度文脈が異なるが、農村・小規模事業者の再エネ導入格差と公正移行の設計論は、地域脱炭素やGX推進における「取り残される主体」への政策設計を考える上で示唆がある。
In the global GX context
Adds empirical evidence on distributive justice in energy transition, relevant to the 'just transition' pillar of global climate policy and to transition-finance debates on who gets access to clean-energy capital in emerging markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:公正移行の実証研究として、導入格差を規定する社会経済要因の分析枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:新興国サプライチェーンや農業分野の脱炭素調達を検討する企業にとって、現地の再エネ普及障壁を把握する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:再エネ補助金や農村インフラ整備を、無電化・低導入地域へ標的化する際の根拠となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change necessitates that farmers explore alternative renewable energy sources to meet their immediate energy needs and reduce carbon emissions. The study aimed to determine the potential for energy transition in proactive land acquisition strategy (PLAS) farms in South Africa and identify factors associated with energy transition. Data from 1956 PLAS farms across the country were collected and analysed. Results showed that about 58% of the farmers relied on grid electricity, mainly supplied by Eskom. Only 13% and 0.3% of farmers used solar and wind as renewable energy sources, respectively. These findings are important for policy and practice because the low uptake of solar and wind energy among PLAS farmers highlights a missed opportunity to advance climate-smart agriculture, reduce production costs, and enhance energy resilience in rural farming systems. Moreover, there is a need for renewable-energy subsidies, clearer policy incentives, and improved rural energy infrastructure. A further disaggregation of solar-powered PLAS farms by province revealed the Northern and Western Cape as the most promising regions for solar energy development. At the same time, the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal had relatively low potential. Farmers who had no electricity at all accounted for 26%, indicating low-hanging fruit for the Just Energy Transition (JET) strategy. The logistic regression results suggest that factors such as gender, farm size, education level, whether a farmer is receiving recap, and whether Eskom supplies electricity significantly influence the use of solar energy. Therefore, just transition policies should target these factors to ensure efficient and effective implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2026/v54n7a24469first seen 2026-11-10 04:44:37 · last seen 2026-11-12 04:40:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。