Can the ‘One Health’ approach be integrated into blue carbon projects? A perspective from the Philippines
「One Health」アプローチはブルーカーボンプロジェクトに統合できるか？フィリピンからの視点 (AI 翻訳)
Jay Mar D. Quevedo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、マングローブや海草藻場などのブルーカーボン生態系が気候変動緩和だけでなく、人間と動物の健康にも貢献することを指摘し、One Healthアプローチの統合を提案する。フィリピンの事例を通じて、炭素貯留に加えて感染症リスク低減や漁業回復などの便益を強調することで、投資家の信頼と地域の受容性が高まると論じる。制度的連携や健康指標の主流化などの政策・研究の方向性も示している。
English
This paper argues that integrating a One Health approach into blue carbon projects can enhance both implementation and financing by demonstrating health co-benefits beyond carbon sequestration. Using a Philippine case study, it shows how mangrove restoration reduces disease risk, supports fisheries, and improves food security. It proposes policy pathways including institutional bridging and co-benefit financing to operationalize this integration.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもブルーカーボンプロジェクトが拡大しているが、健康便益を明示的に組み込む事例は少ない。本稿のフレームワークは、日本の海外展開や地域プロジェクトにおいて、投資家や地域住民への訴求力を高める可能性がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, nature-based solutions like blue carbon are gaining traction under climate finance frameworks. This paper adds a novel dimension by linking health outcomes to carbon projects, potentially increasing investor confidence and aligning with sustainable development goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for integrating One Health into blue carbon governance, highlighting co-benefits beyond carbon.
🏢実務担当者:Project developers can use the One Health framing to attract finance by emphasizing health outcomes alongside carbon credits.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider institutional bridging and health indicators in blue carbon policy design to unlock co-benefits.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Blue carbon ecosystems such as mangrove forests, seagrass meadows, and tidal marshes are widely recognized for their role in climate change mitigation. Although these ecosystems also provide co-benefits that support human and animal health, these values are often overlooked in blue carbon projects. This perspective article argues that integrating a One Health approach into blue carbon projects can strengthen both implementation and financing mechanisms by demonstrating co-benefits that go beyond carbon sequestration. Drawing on the case of Del Carmen in the Philippines, the paper illustrates how mangrove restoration projects not only enhance carbon storage but also reduce vector-borne disease risks, support fisheries recovery, and contribute to food and nutrition security. Despite interest from local leaders and investors, blue carbon financing schemes in the Philippines have yet to gain traction. This paper proposes that framing such initiatives within a One Health context could increase investor confidence and community acceptance by emphasizing tangible health benefits alongside carbon credits. The article concludes by outlining policy and research pathways, including institutional bridging, mainstreaming health indicators, pilot programs, and co-benefit financing, that can help operationalize One Health integration in the overall blue carbon governance across tropical developing countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100347first seen 2026-06-17 05:59:54 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:14:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。