Evaluation of low carbon energy-carrier options for future non-road mobile machinery: A multisector case study
将来の非道路移動機械向け低炭素エネルギーキャリアの評価：マルチセクターケーススタディ (AI 翻訳)
Rasmus Pettinen, Sahas Shah, Tansu Galimova, Christian Breyer, Saba Norouzi, Sami Repo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、非道路移動機械（NRMM）の脱炭素化に向けて、農業用トラクター、林業機械、港湾機械、建設機械の4つのユースケースを対象に、電気由来のエネルギーキャリア（e-fuel、バッテリー電動、ハイブリッド）の実現可能性を評価した。結果として、単一の代替エネルギーでは全ての用途に対応できず、政策と規制の進展がエネルギーキャリア選択に決定的な役割を果たすことを示した。コストと実用性のトレードオフも明らかにし、適切な低炭素技術を選択するための分析手法を提供している。
English
This study evaluates low-carbon energy carriers (e-fuels, battery electric, hybrid) for non-road mobile machinery across four use cases: agriculture, forestry, port, and construction. It finds that no single solution fits all; the feasibility depends heavily on the use case, policy, and future CO2 legislation. Trade-offs between cost and practicality are highlighted, and analytical methods are provided to assist technology selection.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも建設機械や農業機械の脱炭素化が進む中、本論文は欧州の規制動向を踏まえた具体的なユースケース分析を提供している。日本のGX政策（例：グリーン成長戦略における建設機械の電動化）と比較し、規制の役割や技術選択のトレードオフを考察する際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper fills a gap in sector-specific decarbonization analysis for non-road mobile machinery, which is often overlooked compared to road transport. It provides a systematic comparison of e-fuels, battery electric, and hybrid solutions under realistic use cases, offering valuable insights for global policymakers and manufacturers navigating the energy transition in heavy machinery.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparative framework and empirical data for four NRMM use cases, advancing sector-specific decarbonization research.
🏢実務担当者:Analytical methods help equipment manufacturers assess trade-offs between cost, practicality, and emissions for different energy carriers.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates the decisive role of CO2 legislation in shaping future energy carrier adoption, informing regulatory design for non-road sectors.
📄 Abstract（原文）
• Decarbonization methods of the non-road mobile machines are use-case dependent. • No single energy carrier option may be able to substitute fossil fuels alone. • Progression of CO 2 legislation has a decisive role for the future energy carriers. • Low-carbon alternatives will introduce trade-offs between costs and practicality. • Developed analytical methods assist selecting the appropriate low-carbon technology. No single solution can meet the diverse decarbonization needs of the NRMM (non-road mobile machinery) sector. Instead, the focus should be on identifying the most viable decarbonization methods for specific use cases, given the wide range of operational requirements, working cycles, and environments within NRMM. Existing studies often lack detailed, up-to-date comparisons of energy carrier options for specific NRMM segments, with most addressing the issue at a general level or focusing on individual technologies. This study aims to fill that gap by examining the key factors influencing decarbonization solutions for four common NRMM use cases: agricultural tractors, forestry equipment, port applications, and construction machinery. It limits its scope to electricity-based energy carriers (e-fuels, battery electric, and hybrid solutions) due to the exclusion of biogenic alternatives by the European Commission. The primary objective is to assess mechanisms affecting CO 2 emissions, excluding other pollutants, and to provide more detailed insights compared to prior studies, which often lack precision in reflecting real-world boundaries and use cases. The study highlights several viable energy carrier alternatives to fossil diesel for decarbonizing NRMM, emphasizing that their feasibility is heavily influenced by their use case, policy and future regulations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.139394first seen 2026-05-17 06:03:38 · last seen 2026-05-20 05:10:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。