gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Repeatability Across Generations

世代を超えた再現可能性 (AI 翻訳)

Backlund, Ivar

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-16#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20219568
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20219568

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、エネルギーシステムや産業開発が100〜500年にわたり生態・資源の限界内で維持可能か評価する「世代を超えた再現可能性」フレームワークを提案。現行の低材料型と拡大する鉱物型エネルギーシステムの併存を批判的に検討し、地方自治体の関与、会社法改革、十分性(sufficiency)の必要性を論じる。

English

This paper proposes a 'Repeatability Across Generations' framework to assess if energy systems and industrial development can be sustained over 100-500 years within ecological and resource limits. It critiques the parallel operation of low-material and mineral-based energy systems, advocating for municipal influence, corporate law reform, and sufficiency.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策は主に排出削減に焦点を当てるが、本フレームワークは資源制約と長期的持続可能性を考慮する点で、SSBJや統合報告書の評価視点を補完する可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This framework challenges current GX metrics by emphasizing material throughput and long-term ecological boundaries, complementing EU policies like CRMA and offering a broader lens for ISSB and transition finance discussions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:A novel interdisciplinary framework for assessing long-term sustainability beyond carbon metrics.

🏢実務担当者:Can inform corporate strategy on resource efficiency and long-term project viability.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights need for legal and regulatory reforms to embed ecological boundaries in business operations.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This document presents Repeatability Across Generations as a physically and institutionally grounded framework for long-term stewardship and resource management, designed to assess whether energy systems, infrastructures, data centres, industrial development pathways and business models can be maintained and repeated over 100–500 years within ecological, material and energy boundaries. The starting point is that today’s societies are, in practice, operating two non-green energy systems in parallel: an established, relatively low-material-intensity system with its main waste flow in the atmosphere, and a rapidly expanding mineral-based system with geological waste flows in the form of tailings, waste rock, chemical residual flows and long-lived pollution. The document is structured around three central questions: binding municipal influence, Repeatability Across Generations and reform of the Companies Act. Binding municipal influence is treated as a democratic safety valve where land, water, landscapes and living environments are at stake. Repeatability Across Generations is formulated as a long-term test of whether projects, technologies and systems can be carried, maintained and repeated across several generations. Reform of the Companies Act is treated as necessary in order for the profit motive to be explicitly subordinated to binding ecological and material boundaries. Sufficiency thereby emerges as the material direction towards which the assessment points: the total throughput of energy and materials must decrease if society is to remain within the boundaries of the biosphere over time. The document addresses, among other things, biodiversity, freshwater, declining ore grades, critical and strategic minerals, the CRMA and other EU-related policy instruments, AI data centres, the consequences of the emerging high-tech society and corporate responsibility. All of this leads back to the question of Repeatability Across Generations. The document does not take a position for one technology or against another. It asks the same question of all technologies, projects and systems: can they be carried, maintained and repeated across generations without depleting resources, damaging freshwater, undermining biodiversity or leaving behind long-lived waste flows? The document can be used as a basis for analysis, public education and local or municipal assessment of projects related to energy, raw materials and industrial development. This publication is also accompanied by the conversation guide Suggested format for a conversation on Repeatability Across Generations, which provides a suggested routine and format for a conversation, discussion meeting or study circle on the questions raised by the document: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20381225 The Swedish version is available here: Upprepbarhet över Generationer: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18854430

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。