建築物の気候適応とカーボンフットプリント削減：ライフサイクル管理におけるバランスの追求
CLIMATE ADAPTATION OF BUILDINGS AND CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION: SEEKING A BALANCE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT (原題)
L. Oparina, Y. Obuhova, V. Ogurtsov, A. Petruhin, A. Goreva
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、建築物の気候適応策とライフサイクル炭素削減の間に生じる方法論的パラドックスを整理する。適応策を炭素影響別に「衝突・中立・相乗」に分類し、パッシブ設計や深層改修、低炭素材料、自然基盤解決策、デジタルモニタリングを優先すべきと主張する。気候リスクと炭素予算をBIMに統合する設計手法を提言する。
English
This paper examines the methodological paradox between building climate adaptation and life-cycle carbon reduction. It classifies adaptation measures into conflict, neutral, and synergistic groups by carbon effect, prioritizing passive design, deep energy renovation, low-carbon materials, nature-based solutions, and digital monitoring. It recommends integrating climate risk and carbon budgets into BIM-based design.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ・有報での気候関連開示が進み、不動産・建設セクターのScope3および適応策の説明責任が増す。本稿の適応×脱炭素の分類は、TCFDシナリオ分析や移行計画の実務に直接応用可能。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD and TCFD-aligned disclosure expand, real estate and construction firms face pressure to reconcile adaptation and decarbonization. This paper offers a taxonomy that can inform transition plans and scenario-based life-cycle management globally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:建築ライフサイクル評価と適応策の炭素影響分類に関する方法論的枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:設計・調達段階で適応策の炭素影響を評価し、BIMに気候リスクと炭素予算を統合する実務指針となる。
🏛政策担当者:建築基準や適応政策において、炭素予算と整合する適応策の優先順位付けを検討する根拠を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The article examines the relationship between climate adaptation of buildings and reduction of their carbon footprint over the life cycle. It is shown that contemporary architectural and construction science is facing a methodological paradox: increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases intensify climate risks and increase the need for building adaptation measures; however, some of these measures require additional energy, materials and equipment, which may increase operational and embodied greenhouse gas emissions. The purpose of the article is to systematize Russian and international studies on this issue and to develop recommendations aimed at transforming the conflict between adaptation and decarbonization into synergy. The methodological basis of the study includes a systematized review of scientific publications, analysis of regulatory and methodological documents, and generalization of open climate data. A classification of adaptation measures according to their carbon effect is proposed, with conflict, neutral and synergistic groups of measures identified. It is substantiated that priority should be given to passive architectural and structural solutions, deep energy renovation, low-carbon materials, nature-based solutions, digital monitoring, and scenario-based life cycle management of capital construction projects. Recommendations are formulated for integrating climate risks and the carbon budget into the building information model and the system of design solutions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://bulletinbstu.editorum.ru/en/nauka/article/6a9c167632807fdbab875c7c/pdffirst seen 2026-10-12 05:15:40 · last seen 2026-10-14 05:47:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。