Carbon Farming and Agroforestry: Synergies, Trade‑Offs, and a Deci‑ sion Framework for Climate‑Smart Landscapes
炭素農法とアグロフォレストリー：気候スマートな景観のための相乗効果、トレードオフ、意思決定フレームワーク (AI 翻訳)
Muhammad Adil
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、アグロフォレストリーとバイオ炭の統合による土壌有機炭素蓄積の可能性を定量化し、127の圃場試験と10のメタ分析を基に、熱帯シルボパスチャー＋バイオ炭で最大2.6 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹の蓄積率を示した。AI支援灌漑やナノ改良材を用いたトレードオフ緩和策、デジタルMRV・ブロックチェーンを組み込んだ4段階の意思決定フレームワークを提案し、小規模農家での炭素農法の拡大に実践的経路を与える。
English
This review quantifies the potential of integrated agroforestry and biochar systems for soil organic carbon sequestration, drawing on 127 field studies and ten meta-analyses. Tropical silvopasture plus biochar achieves highest SOC accrual (2.6 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹). Trade-offs such as water competition are mitigated by AI-assisted irrigation and nano-enabled amendments. A four-phase decision framework incorporating digital MRV and blockchain is proposed to scale carbon farming in smallholder landscapes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、J-クレジットやオフセット制度で炭素農法が注目されつつある。本フレームワークはMRVの実装やSSBJにおける土地由来の除去量報告に示唆を与え、国内農業分野のGX推進に活用可能。
In the global GX context
With ISSB and CSRD requiring nature-related disclosures, high-integrity MRV for carbon removals is critical. This decision framework, integrating digital MRV and blockchain, provides a model for scaling carbon farming globally, aligning with voluntary carbon market standards and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a synthesized quantification of SOC potentials and a nexus analysis linking carbon gains to sustainability dimensions, useful for future research on integrated agroforestry-biochar systems.
🏢実務担当者:The four-phase decision framework offers a practical guide for implementing carbon farming projects with robust MRV and community benefit-sharing.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights trade-offs and synergies that can inform national carbon accounting, subsidy design, and incentives for climate-smart agriculture.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon farming through agroforestry and biochar amendment is widely recognised as a climate‑smart strategy, yet the quantitative integration of their combined effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) and the operationalisation of monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) remain fragmented across the literature. This review synthesises published meta‑analytical evidence, mechanistic studies, and case examples to assess SOC sequestration potentials, synergies, and trade‑offs of integrated agroforestry–biochar systems. We draw on 127 field studies and ten global meta‑analyses to quantify carbon pool dynamics and to construct a nexus analysis linking carbon gains to seven dimensions of sustainability. Tropical silvopasture combined with biochar shows the highest average SOC accrual (2.6 Mg C ha⁻1 yr⁻1), while temperate alley‑cropping with biochar achieves 1.8 Mg C ha⁻1 yr⁻1. Trade‑offs such as water competition (yield reductions of 10–25% in semi‑arid settings) can be mitigated by AI‑assisted irrigation scheduling and nano‑enabled soil amendments. A novel four‑phase decision‑support framework is developed and illustrated with a hypothetical Sahelian case study, embedding digital MRV, blockchain verification, and community‑based benefit‑sharing mechanisms. By bridging the gap between scientific evidence and market‑ready carbon removal, this framework provides a practical pathway for scaling carbon farming in diverse smallholder landscapes. Limitations and priority research directions are clearly identified.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v5i3.102479first seen 2026-07-24 05:42:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。