エネルギー転換における経済的手法
Economic Instruments in the Energy Transition (原題)
Ewelina Sokołowska, Magdalena Olczyk
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本書章は、炭素税・排出量取引・競争入札・収益安定化契約・動的料金などの経済的手法が、技術を指定せず価格・負担・報酬を通じて脱炭素行動を誘導する仕組みを解説する。短期運用・長期投資・イノベーション・需要側柔軟性という行動マージンに手法選択を結びつける設計志向の枠組みと類型を提示。電力・産業・建築・運輸での実践を比較し、実効性・負担可能性・競争力・公平性のトレードオフや、歳入再循環・補償・透明性が政治的持続性を左右する点を論じる。
English
This chapter presents a design-oriented framework for economic instruments in energy policy—carbon and energy taxes, emissions trading, auctions, revenue-stabilising contracts, and demand-side tools like dynamic tariffs. It links instrument choice to behavioural margins (operation, investment, innovation, flexibility) and compares performance across power, industry, buildings, and transport. It highlights trade-offs among effectiveness, affordability, competitiveness, and fairness, showing how revenue recycling and transparency shape political durability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法・GX-ETSやカーボンプライシング導入議論が進む中、手法選択と政策ミックスの設計・順序づけ・政治的持続性を考える枠組みとして、政策立案者・企業の脱炭素戦略に直接示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Amid ISSB/CSRD-driven disclosure and growing carbon-pricing regimes (EU ETS, CBAM), this chapter offers a comparative design lens for policy mixes, revenue recycling, and credibility under uncertainty—useful for linking disclosure to real-economy incentives.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:経済的手法の設計と行動マージンを結ぶ分析枠組みを、政策ミックス研究の整理に活用できる。
🏢実務担当者:炭素価格・入札・収益安定化契約が投資判断や調達コストに与える影響を見極める材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:歳入再循環・補償・透明性を含む政策ミックスの設計と順序づけ、政治的持続性の条件を検討できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
This chapter explains how economic instruments in energy policy steer behaviour by changing relative prices, liabilities, and rewards rather than prescribing a single technology. It develops a design-oriented framework that connects instrument choice to the behavioural margins that determine decarbonisation: short-run operation, long-run investment, innovation, and demand-side flexibility. This chapter sets out theoretical foundations and a practical typology, covering carbon and energy taxes, emissions trading, investment and innovation support, competitive auctions, contracts that stabilise revenues, and market-based demand-side tools such as dynamic tariffs and efficiency obligations. It then examines what these instruments do in practice across power, industry, buildings, and transport, and why performance depends on institutional capacity, policy interactions, and expectations about future stringency. This chapter highlights recurrent trade-offs involving effectiveness, affordability, competitiveness, and fairness and shows how revenue recycling, compensation, and transparency shape political durability. Readers gain criteria for selecting and sequencing instruments, anticipating side effects, and designing policy mixes that remain credible under uncertainty and shocks. Economic instruments are policy tools that steer behaviour by altering relative prices, liabilities, or rewards rather than prescribing a single technology. In energy policy, they are used to internalise environmental damages, mobilise revenues, and reduce investment risk across power, industry, buildings, and transport. Because the energy transition depends on millions of decentralised operational and investment decisions, the core analytical question is whether these instruments translate public objectives into credible incentives that deliver emissions reductions without destabilising affordability, security of supply, or legitimacy. Economic instruments also sit within sustainable development agendas that seek to reconcile environmental protection with prosperity and social inclusion, making distributional and regional impacts part of policy design rather than residual side effects. This chapter develops a design-oriented account of economic instruments in energy policy. Section 2.1 sets out theoretical foundations and a typology; Section 2.2 analyses the roles these instruments play in the energy transition in comparative perspective; Section 2.3 examines recurrent design challenges and trade-offs; Section 2.4 highlights governance and legitimacy conditions that shape durability.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003713784-3first seen 2026-09-13 04:49:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。