Data and code from: False reporting undermines the integrity of supply chain sustainability initiatives
虚偽報告はサプライチェーン持続可能性イニシアチブの完全性を損なう (AI 翻訳)
Federico Cammelli, Johan Six, Rachael Garrett
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
農業サプライチェーンにおける持続可能性基準の検証報告で、農家とデータ収集者の共謀が25%の報告で発生することを初めて定量化。閾値情報を隠すことで共謀が11%に減少することをRCTで実証。報告精度の向上が基準の有効性と公平性に不可欠と示唆。
English
This study quantifies collusion in sustainability verification reports for cocoa supply chains, finding 25% collusion, reduced to 11% by withholding compliance thresholds. It underscores that monitoring and traceability alone are insufficient without ensuring reporting accuracy, crucial for the effectiveness and equity of standards like the EU Deforestation Regulation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の企業はサプライチェーンにおける持続可能性報告の信頼性確保が求められており、本研究成果は報告制度の設計や監査プロセス改善に示唆を与える。特にEU森林破壊規制への対応が迫られる中、報告精度の重要性を再認識させる。
In the global GX context
This research provides empirical evidence on the integrity of supply chain sustainability reporting, directly relevant to global frameworks like the EU Deforestation Regulation and ISSB disclosure standards. It highlights the need for robust verification mechanisms beyond traceability, informing policy and corporate practice.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides novel empirical evidence on collusion in sustainability reporting and a tested intervention to reduce it.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for reporting accuracy mechanisms in supply chain sustainability programs to ensure credibility.
🏛政策担当者:Informs the design of verification systems for sustainability regulations, emphasizing the importance of reporting accuracy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The supply chains of agricultural commodities are major drivers of tropical deforestation and forest degradation. Sustainability standards are fundamental to improve sustainability in these supply chains, but they rely on field data collected by actors who may benefit from favorable outcomes—creating potential for collusion. This study is the first to quantify such collusion and test a design to reduce it. We study a tree planting program for cocoa farmers in Côte d’Ivoire and find that collusion between farmers and data collectors occurs in 25% of field verification reports. A randomized controlled trial shows that withholding information about the compliance threshold reduces collusion to 11%. These findings highlight that monitoring and traceability alone are insufficient to detect compliance unless reporting accuracy is also ensured. Improving reporting accuracy, while supporting farmers, is key to ensuring both the effectiveness and equity of sustainability standards, including the EU Deforestation Regulation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v9s4mw77qfirst seen 2026-08-06 05:05:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。