Governing a Just Net Zero Transition: The Bristol Toolkit and City and Community Visions for Change
Terwilliger, Joel
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブリストル市のジャストトランジションのためのツールキット（4レンズモデル、トライポッドアプローチなど）を解説。都市レベルとコミュニティレベルのビジョンを比較し、影響フレームワークやモニタリングの構造的不一致を指摘。共同利益と実践のギャップは制度的・関係的・政治的であり、共有モニタリング基盤への投資が必要と結論。
English
This brief presents Bristol's cross-sector toolkit for just net zero transition governance, including the Four-Lens Model and Tripod Approach. It compares city-level and community-level visions, finding structural misalignment in impact frameworks and monitoring approaches. Argues that the gap between co-benefits ambition and practice is institutional, relational, and political, requiring deliberate investment in shared monitoring infrastructure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の自治体による脱炭素計画（ゼロカーボンシティ）や地域コミュニティとの連携において、このような参加型ガバナンスの枠組みやモニタリングの設計は参考になる。特にSSBJや有報での非財務情報開示が進む中、地域レベルの移行計画の実効性を高める示唆を持つ。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global just transition scholarship by offering a practical governance toolkit and highlighting the need for aligned monitoring between city and community levels. Relevant for cities worldwide developing net zero pathways under TCFD/ISSB frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured toolkit and identifies institutional gaps in just transition governance; useful for further empirical research on multi-level climate action.
🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete models (Four-Lens, Tripod) and case study insights for designing inclusive net zero strategies at city and community levels.
🏛政策担当者:Underlines the need for shared monitoring infrastructure and policy coherence between funding streams to achieve just transition goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Third brief in the Net Zero Futures Research Series. Maps Bristol's cross-sector decision-support toolkit for just transition governance — including the Four-Lens Model for place-based innovation, the Tripod Approach to net zero delivery (demand, supply, finance, data), the Climate Action Change Pyramid, the Community Climate and Nature Action Model, and the Just Transition in Action Model — across public sector, knowledge and advisory, and voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector actors. Synthesises city-level (Climate City Contract) and community-level (17 Community Climate Action Plans) visions for change and finds structural misalignment between parallel impact frameworks, theories of change, and monitoring approaches developed through separate funding streams. Argues that the gap between co-benefits ambition and practice in Bristol is institutional, relational, and political, and that deliberate investment in shared monitoring infrastructure and feedback loops between city and community planning levels is required. Offers practical implications for policymakers, cities, and funders on just transition governance design.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/20595591first seen 2026-06-09 04:15:17 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:13:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。