gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

AI-driven knowledge management for sustainable businesses: a comprehensive analysis

持続可能な企業のためのAI駆動型知識経営:包括的分析 (AI 翻訳)

Furong Cai, E. Bolisani, M. Nakash, T. C. Kassaneh

VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-02#AI×ESGOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.1108/vjikms-09-2025-0444
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-09-2025-0444

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、AIが知識経営(KM)を強化し持続可能な企業変革を支援する仕組みを、80文献の系統的レビューで分析。ビブリオメトリクスと質的分析を組み合わせ、AI-KM-サステナビリティの三要素がモーター・テーマであること、グリーン・イノベーションとサーキュラー・エコノミーが重要なフロンティアであることを示す。加えて、成熟度モデルや意思決定フレームワークを提供し、倫理ガバナンスの課題も指摘する。

English

This systematic review of 80 articles (2004-2025) explores how AI enhances knowledge management (KM) for sustainable business transformation in the context of Industry 5.0. It identifies KM, AI, and sustainability as core motor themes, with green innovation and circular economy as emerging frontiers. The paper provides actionable maturity models and decision-support frameworks for practitioners, while highlighting sociocultural and ethical governance barriers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本レビューは日本のGX戦略において、AIを活用した知識経営が企業の脱炭素・サステナビリティ変革にどう貢献し得るかを示唆する。特にSSBJ開示や有報への統合が進む中、AI-KMフレームワークは非財務情報の効率的な管理・活用に有用と考えられる。ただし、日本の制度や事例に特化した分析ではない点に注意。

In the global GX context

While not focused on climate disclosure, this review offers a broad framework linking AI and knowledge management to corporate sustainability, relevant to companies seeking to operationalize ESG strategies under frameworks like ISSB or CSRD. It emphasizes human-AI collaboration and ethical governance, aligning with global trends in sustainable finance and transition planning.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:The study provides a comprehensive synthesis of AI-KM-sustainability literature and a research agenda prioritizing longitudinal designs and ethical accountability.

🏢実務担当者:Presents maturity models and decision-support frameworks for integrating AI-KM into corporate sustainability strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights sociocultural and ethical governance barriers that regulators may need to address in promoting AI-driven sustainability.

📄 Abstract(原文)

To address mounting environmental, social and economic pressures, this study aims to explore how artificial intelligence (AI) enhances knowledge management (KM) to support sustainable business transformation, particularly within the emerging context of Industry 5.0. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, this mixed-methods systematic review analyzes 80 articles (2004–2025) from Scopus and Web of Science. The methodology combines descriptive bibliometrics (e.g. publication trends) and R-based science mapping (e.g. thematic networks) with qualitative content analysis to decode the AI–KM–sustainability nexus. Bibliometrics reveal exponential post-2019 growth, Asian geographic dominance and reliance on cross-sectional surveys. Thematic mapping identifies KM, AI and sustainability as anchor motor themes, with green innovation and circular economy as a critical emergent frontier. Qualitatively, six core themes form a tripartite framework: technological foundations, organizational strategy and ecological outcomes. It demonstrates how AI–KM integration enhances dynamic capabilities, while highlighting critical sociocultural and ethical governance barriers. This study provides managers with actionable maturity models and decision-support frameworks to operationalize corporate sustainability strategies and navigate complex digital integrations. Within the Industry 5.0 context, this research emphasizes the need for human–AI collaborative ecosystems, advocating for technological democratization, ethical governance and inclusive knowledge sharing. By positioning the knowledge-based view as the primary analytical anchor, supplemented by dynamic capabilities and socio-technical systems theory, this study establishes a comprehensive framework linking AI-driven KM with sustainability. It proposes a targeted research agenda prioritizing longitudinal designs, global inclusivity and ethical accountability.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。