Green Investments, Energy Transition and Sustainable Economic Growth: Evidence From the <scp>USA</scp> and China
グリーン投資、エネルギー転換、持続可能な経済成長：米国と中国の実証分析 (AI 翻訳)
Özlem Ülger
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、1990～2023年の年次データを用いて、米国と中国におけるグリーン投資、エネルギー転換指標、経済成長の短期・長期関係をVECMにより分析した。結果は両国で異なり、米国ではグリーン投資は一人当たりGDPと正の長期関係を示すが、中国では負の関係となる。また、再生可能エネルギー生産の影響も国により異なり、エネルギー転換の効果は国情に依存する。
English
Using annual data from 1990-2023 and a VECM framework, this study examines short- and long-run relationships among green investment, energy transition indicators, and economic growth in the USA and China. Results show divergent long-run relationships: green investment positively relates to GDP per capita in the USA but negatively in China. Findings highlight that energy transition effects on growth depend on country-specific structural conditions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、グリーン投資と経済成長の関係が国別に異なる点が示唆的。日本の産業構造や政策フレームワークを考慮した独自の分析が必要であることを示す。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a comparative empirical framework relevant to global GX discourse, showing that green investment impacts on growth are context-dependent. It underscores the need for country-specific policies in energy transition, relevant for ISSB and transition finance discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The paper provides a comparative VECM methodology and evidence on green investment-growth dynamics, useful for further cross-country studies.
🏢実務担当者:Investors and corporate strategists can note that green investment outcomes vary by country, informing portfolio and operational decisions.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider country-specific structural factors when designing green investment and energy transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT This study examines the short‐ and long‐run relationships among green investment, energy transition indicators, and economic growth in the USA and China within the framework of a Vector Error Correction Model, using annual data for the period 1990–2023. The findings indicate that long‐run relationships differ between the two countries. While the green investment indicator exhibits a positive long‐run relationship with real GDP per capita in the USA, the estimated cointegration relationship for China is negative. Gross fixed capital formation emerges as one of the key determinants of economic growth in both countries. Findings related to renewable energy production also differ across countries, suggesting that the effects of the energy transition on economic growth depend on country‐specific structural conditions. In addition, the impulse‐response analysis reveals that green investment shocks generate country‐specific dynamic effects on economic growth and carbon emissions. Overall, the findings suggest that the effects of green investments on economic growth may vary depending on institutional structure, the policy framework, and the pace of the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71393first seen 2026-07-23 05:04:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。