Beyond the Brussels Carbon Order: Rebalancing Global CarbonPolitics, Trade Justice, and the Right to Development
ブリュッセルの炭素秩序を超えて：世界炭素政治、貿易正義、開発の権利の再調整 (AI 翻訳)
Loso Judijanto
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EUのETS、CBAM、EUDRが途上国に及ぼす影響を文献レビューで分析。環境効果と政治的正統性のバランスを問い、費用負担が不公平に転嫁される可能性を指摘。パーム油事例から小規模農家の排除リスクを示し、包摂的な国際炭素ガバナンスの枠組みを提案する。
English
This qualitative review examines how EU climate instruments (ETS, CBAM, EUDR) affect developing economies, highlighting regressive cost burdens and non-tariff barriers. Using palm oil as a case, it shows how traceability rules can exclude smallholders. Proposes an inclusive global carbon governance compact based on co-design, differentiated obligations, and technology transfer.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業はEU輸出においてCBAMやEUDRの影響を受ける可能性があり、サプライチェーン全体での対応が求められる。また、日本のカーボンプライシング政策やGX推進にも、国際的な公平性の視点が示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on carbon border measures and climate justice, relevant for ISSB and CSRD implementation. It highlights the need for equitable transition finance and inclusive supply-chain governance, informing policymakers and multinational corporations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:EU炭素国境措置の国際政治経済学と気候正義の接点を整理した文献レビューとして有用。
🏢実務担当者:EU輸出企業はCBAM・EUDR対応における途上国サプライヤーとの協働の重要性を認識できる。
🏛政策担当者:日本のカーボンプライシングや国際交渉において、途上国への配慮と制度設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The European Union has converted domestic climate ambition into a form of global regulatory power through the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). This qualitative literature review examines whether that emerging Brussels-centred carbon order can remain environmentally effective and politically legitimate when its adjustment costs are disproportionately borne by developing economies. Drawing on journal literature published mainly since 2020, the article synthesizes scholarship on global carbon politics, the Brussels Effect, carbon leakage, border adjustment, deforestation-free supply chains, climate justice, and the right to development. It finds that EU instruments can stimulate cleaner production and improve supply-chain transparency, but also transmit measurement, reporting, verification, traceability, certification, and financing costs down value chains in regressive ways. These effects can operate as non-tariff barriers even when the measures pursue legitimate environmental objectives and are formally imposed on EU importers. Palm oil illustrates the problem clearly: although palm oil is not a CBAM commodity, EUDR and related European sustainability rules can exclude smallholders whose environmental performance may be acceptable but whose land records, geolocation data, or chain-of-custody systems remain incomplete. The article argues that durable global carbon governance requires more than unilateral diffusion of European rules. It proposes an inclusive compact based on co-design, differentiated obligations, recognition of equivalent policies, revenue recycling, technology transfer, smallholder-centred traceability, and accessible review mechanisms. Climate leadership will command followers only when decarbonization is aligned with distributive justice and credible development pathways.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.47363/jpsir/2026(4)160first seen 2026-08-07 04:59:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。