Nested Carbon Governance in Southeast Asia: Towards Just Nature‐Based Solutions?
東南アジアにおける入れ子型炭素ガバナンス：公正な自然を基盤とした解決策に向けて？ (AI 翻訳)
Helena Varkkey, Michelle Ann Miller, David Taylor
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、東南アジアにおける自然を基盤とした解決策（NbS）のガバナンスを、地域・国家政策文書の分析と5つの比較事例研究（森林、泥炭地、沿岸生態系）を通じて検討する。国際的な定義や言説が地域・国家のNbS政策を形成する一方、実施は不均一であり、インドネシア、ラオス、マレーシア、タイの事例では、入れ子型ガバナンスが弱く、先住民や地域コミュニティが利益共有から排除されている。公正で包摂的なNbSの拡大の必要性を強調する。
English
This paper examines nature-based solutions (NbS) governance in Southeast Asia through qualitative analysis of policy documents and five case studies across forests, peatlands, and coastal ecosystems. It finds that while NbS framings are increasingly visible, implementation is uneven, with weak nested governance and exclusion of Indigenous and local communities from benefit-sharing in some cases. The study underscores the need for integrated, transparent, and inclusive approaches to scaling NbS.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、NbSや炭素市場への関心が高まる中、本論文は国際的なNbS政策と地域実施の乖離を示し、日本のODAや民間投資における公正性の考慮に示唆を与える。また、JCMやREDD+関連の政策立案にも参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global discussions on NbS governance and carbon markets, highlighting equity and justice issues in Southeast Asia. It offers insights for international frameworks like the Paris Agreement and emerging carbon market mechanisms, emphasizing the need for inclusive governance structures.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for analyzing nested governance of NbS across scales, useful for scholars studying climate policy and equity.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of inclusive benefit-sharing and alignment with national climate goals for project developers and investors in NbS.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on governance gaps and the need for integrated, transparent policies to scale NbS equitably.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Nature‐based solutions (NbS) have gained prominence as an integrated approach to addressing climate change and biodiversity loss while supporting sustainable development. Yet, their implementation across Southeast Asia remains fragmented and often contested. This paper uses qualitative documentary analysis of regional and national policy documents, complemented by five comparative case studies spanning forests, peatlands and coastal ecosystems. It investigates how carbon‐dense ecosystems in Southeast Asia are being positioned within evolving global frameworks for NbS and carbon market mechanisms. Our analysis is guided by two questions: (1) How do international definitions and discourses shape regional and national NbS policies? (2) How are governance arrangements structured across scales? The findings from these questions inform our broader discussion of the extent to which these emerging governance regimes aimed at conserving, restoring, or sustainably developing carbon‐dense ecosystems consider issues of equity and justice. We find that NbS framings are increasingly visible in Southeast Asian policy discourses, but operationalisation remains uneven. Whereas some projects align closely with national climate goals (e.g., Vietnam's REDD+ programme), others remain detached from the relevant Nationally Determined Contribution to emissions reduction (project case studies from Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, and Thailand). In such cases, nested governance structures are weakly institutionalised, and Indigenous and local communities are often excluded from benefit‐sharing mechanisms, undermining both legitimacy and equity. These findings underscore the need for more integrated, transparent and inclusive approaches to scaling NbS within the region.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70130first seen 2026-08-08 05:00:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。