← 論文一覧に戻る

資本制約のある低炭素サプライチェーンにおけるCER技術の採用と調整:公平性の観点から

Adopting CER Technology and Coordination in Capital-Constrained Low-Carbon Supply Chains: A Fairness Concern Perspective (原題)

Haiyang Cui, Yu-Wei Li, Gui‐Hua Lin, Xide Zhu

Systems📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-17#サプライチェーンOrigin: CN経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: manufacturing
DOI: 10.3390/systems14081006
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14081006

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

資本制約のあるメーカーが銀行融資で排出削減技術を導入する低炭素サプライチェーンを分析。小売りの公平性懸念が価格・数量・利益に与える影響をモデル化し、調整によるwin-winを条件付きで示した。

English

This paper models a low-carbon supply chain where a capital-constrained manufacturer adopts CER technology via bank loans, considering retailer fairness concerns. It finds that fairness reduces manufacturer profit but can lead to coordination and win-win outcomes under certain conditions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、サプライチェーン排出削減と資金調達の連携が重要であり、本モデルは中小企業の資金制約と取引先との公平性のバランスに示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, this contributes to the literature on low-carbon supply chain finance and coordination, relevant to Scope 3 management and transition finance discussions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Supply chain coordination with fairness and financing in low-carbon context.

🏢実務担当者:Insights for structuring financing and contracts to balance fairness in low-carbon supply chains.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Low-carbon transformation requires substantial investments, challenging capital-constrained manufacturers to adopt carbon emission reduction (CER) technologies. While external financing alleviates capital shortages, it cannot address potential profit imbalances that trigger fairness concerns. We investigate a low-carbon supply chain where a capital-constrained manufacturer adopts CER technologies via a preferential bank loan and sells to a capital-abundant retailer. Unlike prior studies treating CER investments as one-time costs, we model CER technology as a quadratic per-unit royalty licensing fee. We find that, given consumers’ willingness to pay for low-carbon products, financing encourages CER upgrades but creates profit disparities unfavorable to the retailer. Incorporating the retailer’s fairness concerns, results show that compared to the non-fairness scenario, the manufacturer sets a lower wholesale price and cannot earn more. Conversely, the retailer strategically maintains or increases its order quantity, attaining higher profits. Furthermore, the optimal CER level remains invariant regardless of fairness preferences. Finally, supply chain coordination is achievable under specific conditions, yielding a win–win outcome where the manufacturer adopts CER technologies and the retailer’s fairness concerns are accommodated. The quadratic per-unit technology licensing fee we investigated maintains the manufacturer’s motivation and ensures the retailer’s fairness, contributing to the stable and sustainable evolution of low-carbon supply chains.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。